If one "rounds up", then yes ... but 0.9 is not 1.0 in any mathematical terms.
If: 5s = 33 Then: s = 33/5 = 6.6
1 2 3 and 4 are 4 numbers, they are not functions of any sort - cubic polynomial or otherwise.
I think there is confusion between the terms "compounding variable" and "confounding variable". My way of looking at it is that compounding variables describe elements of mathematical functions, only. Confounding variables apply to any research in any domain and are external variables to the research design which might impact on the dependent variable to a lesser or greater extent than the independent variable, which are part of the research design. I am Peter Davies at classmeasures@aol.com
exponent of any number is more than 0
Any mathematical process is an algorithm.
There are many female mathematicians, many still living. Recently Irene Anne Stegun passed away. She was the primary editor of a classic book of mathematical tables called A Handbook of Mathematical Functions.
Any shape is mathematical.
63.3333333333You can search for any mathematical expression, using functions such as: sin, cos, sqrt, etc. You can find a complete list of functions here.RadDegx!Invsinlnπcoslogetan√AnsEXPxy()%AC789÷456×123−0.=+
so, 1/9 = 0.1. (recurring)so, (sq. rt. of 1/0.1Recurring +1 ) !That equals 24!
algebraic expressions are any mathematical formula +, -, x, / ej polynomial functions x2+x=1 a2+b2=1 x/a+y/b=1
If you don't understand the mathematical term "orthogonalized", I'm not sure that any explanation is going to help you much. It basically means a set of wave functions which are independent... that is, the value of one does not depend on the value of any of the others.
binary
A mathematical process is like adding, dividing, subtracting and multiplying or things like that.
X is a variable in the mathematical language. X could be any number, letter or equation.
The spelling eff is also seen, but in any case efand eff would sound the same.For the spelling ess, there are two likely reasons:1) if spelled as es, it could be mistaken for the term E's (more than one E)2) in some plural words, the ending -es has the sound "ezz" not "ess"
yes