This is the same as proving the square root of 3, which I will write sqrt(3) is irrational. When I prove that, I am proving there is not rational number whose square is 3. So here goes: I put some extra help comments in (extra help) like this. Just ignore them if you don't need them.
Let sqrt(3) = a/b where a and b are integers and they are in lowest terms, meaning they have no common factors, WE know if they had common factors we can always find another expression that has no common factors by canceling out the common ones. So a/b does exist.
squaring both sides of sqrt(3) = a/b gives us 3 = a2/b2 so a2 = 3b2
Now a2 must have its factors as even powers of primes.(because of the exponent 2 on the left and both sides must have the same total power since they are equal). So it must
have 32 as one of its factors. (can't be just 3 since that is 31 which is an odd exponent and when added to the 2 in b2 gives us an odd exponents also) This means a must have 3 as a factor. ( if 32 is a factor then 3 must be also)
Now 3b2 has a factor 32 so b2 has a
factor 3. But if b2 has a factor 3, then since powers must be even,
it has 32 as a factor. This means that b must have 3 as a factor also.
So we have shown that both a and b have 3 as a factor. But we stated
that a/b has no common
factors and we just found one, namely 3. So we have a contradiction, and it follows that
we cannot express sqrt(3) as a rational fraction.
Here is another proof from WikiAnswers.com from someone who asked the same question.
The number, , is irrational, ie., it cannot be expressed as a ratio of integers a and b. To prove that this statement is true, let us assume that is rational so that we may write
= a/b
1.
for a and b = any two integers. We must then show that no two such integers can be found. We begin by squaring both sides of eq. 1:
3 = a2/b2
2.
or
3b2 = a2
2a.
If b is odd, then b2 is odd; in this case, a2 and a are also odd. Similarly, if b is even, then b2, a2, and a are even. Since any choice of even values of a and b leads to a ratio a/b that can be reduced by canceling a common factor of 2, we must assume that a and b are odd, and that the ratio a/b is already reduced to smallest possible terms. With a and b both odd, we may write
a = 2m + 1
3.
and
b = 2n +1
Therefore,
(a)^2 + (b)^2 = (2m+1)^2 + (2n+1)^2
and
(a)^2 - (b)^2 = (2m+1)^2 - (2n+1)^2
Also,
[(a)^2 + (b)^2] / [(a)^2 - (b)^2] = 2
Which leads to:
[2(m^2 + n^2) + 2(m + n) + 1] / [2(m^2 - n^2) + 2(m - n)] = 2
Which is impossible since numerator is odd but denominator is even.
A perfect square.
They are squares of rational numbers. there is no particular name for them.
How about 27 whose cube root is 3 which is a rational whole number.
It's rational. It can be written as the quotient of two numbers whose HCF is one.
The product will be a rational number whose absolute value is bigger than the absolute value of the whole number.The product will be a rational number whose absolute value is bigger than the absolute value of the whole number.The product will be a rational number whose absolute value is bigger than the absolute value of the whole number.The product will be a rational number whose absolute value is bigger than the absolute value of the whole number.
A perfect square.
It is another rational number whose numerator and denominator (in the ratio's simplest form) are perfect squares.
Square root of a rational number may either be rational or irrational. For example 1/4 is a rational number whose square root is 1/2. Similarly, 4 is 4/1 which is rational and the square root is 2 which of course is also rational. However, 1/2 and 2 are rational, but their square roots are irrational. We can say the square root of a rational number is always a real number. We can also say the rational numbers whose square roots are also rational are perfect squares or fractions involving perfect squares.
It depends on the number whose square root is being taken.sqrt(4)/3 is rational but sqrt(5)/3 is not.
No, because 15 is not a perfect square. The closest perfect square is 16, whose square root is 4.
They are squares of rational numbers. there is no particular name for them.
No, but it is irrational, because there is no rational number whose square is two. Imaginary numbers are the square roots of negative numbers.
Certainly. Otherwise, there would be a rational number whose square was an irrational number; that is not possible. To show this, let p/q be any rational number, where p and q are integers. Then, the square of p/q is (p^2)/(q^2). Since p^2 and q^2 must both be integers, their quotient is, by definition, a rational number. Thus, the square of every rational number is itself rational.
Yes, for example: square root of 2, and the negative of the square root of 2.
How about 27 whose cube root is 3 which is a rational whole number.
If the square root is a whole number, then the square of the square root, the original number, is also a whole number; all whole numbers can be expressed as themselves over 1, and so are rational numbers. The answer is thus any square number, ie the square of the natural numbers: 1 (1²), 4 (2²), 9 (3²), 16 (4²), etc.
It's rational. It can be written as the quotient of two numbers whose HCF is one.