it is impossible i think. BUT if u want to know go on google type in a hexagon with 3 right angles then click mages and maybe it will show u.
Draw a right angle (90o). Bisect the right angle and there will be two 45o angles. Bisect one of the 45o angles and there will be one 45o angle and two 22.5o angles. A 67.5o angle includes the 45o angle and the 22.5o angle next to it, totaling 67.5o.
An equilateral triangle is a triangle where all sides are the same length and all three angles are the same. The sum of the angles of a triangle is 180 degrees. 180 ÷ 3 = 60
the only way for a right triangle to have a line of symmetry, is if the legs of the triangle are congruent. Or you can show that both non-right angles are congruent (45 degrees). you may also prove that the altitude of the triangle bisects the hypotenuse or that it equals 1/2 of the hypotenuse.
/
The picture you are looking for is a parallelogram.
I need angles both sides of a picture, where I can fix a picture of princess Karen H. Chaer
L
A regular pentagon doesn't have any right angles ! See related link.
____________ / | /_____________ | Crappy drawing, I know, but a right trapezoid has two right angles(right side of picture), and two supplimentary non-right angles(left side of drawing). This is still a trapezoid because in order to be a trapezoid, there must be one and only one pair of parallel lines, and four sides. That's it, thus this is a possible trapezoid.
If you wan't to show that a pentagon has no right angles, then don't put any right angle signs in the figure.
ARAB IS A HORSE RIGHT?
polygon and rectangle
a square, rectangle, rhombus.....
That's exactly what the box means! That box is there to show that an angle is right, as right angles can have different properties than acute or obtuse angles.
No, it is not possible to divide a trapezium into two congruent triangles. A trapezium has only one pair of parallel sides, while a triangle has no parallel sides. Therefore, it is not geometrically feasible to divide a trapezium into two congruent triangles.
No because the shape would have two right angles because of the parallel lines and the limited number of angles available...just no.