The empirical rule can only be used for a normal distribution, so I will assume you are referring to a normal distribution. Chebyshev's theorem can be used for any distribution. The empirical rule is more accurate than Chebyshev's theorem for a normal distribution. For 2 standard deviations (sd) from the mean, the empirical rule says 95% of the data are within that, and Chebyshev's theorem says 1 - 1/2^2 = 1 - 1/4 = 3/4 or 75% of the data are within that. From the standard normal distribution chart, the answer for 2 sd from the mean is 95.44% So, as you can see the empirical rule is more accurate.
Yes, and the justification comes from the Central Limit Theorem.
The central limit theorem is one of two fundamental theories of probability. It's very important because its the reason a great number of statistical procedures work. The theorem states the distribution of an average has the tendency to be normal, even when it turns out that the distribution from which the average is calculated is definitely non-normal.
Price and quantity demanded are both interdependent: there is not an independent variable. From that point of view, there is no reason to put one variable on the x-axis rather than the other.However, putting price on the horizontal axis makes it simpler to add the supply curve on the same chart, and then study the market equilibrium.Price and quantity demanded are both interdependent: there is not an independent variable. From that point of view, there is no reason to put one variable on the x-axis rather than the other.However, putting price on the horizontal axis makes it simpler to add the supply curve on the same chart, and then study the market equilibrium.Price and quantity demanded are both interdependent: there is not an independent variable. From that point of view, there is no reason to put one variable on the x-axis rather than the other.However, putting price on the horizontal axis makes it simpler to add the supply curve on the same chart, and then study the market equilibrium.Price and quantity demanded are both interdependent: there is not an independent variable. From that point of view, there is no reason to put one variable on the x-axis rather than the other.However, putting price on the horizontal axis makes it simpler to add the supply curve on the same chart, and then study the market equilibrium.
If you have ever heard of a 3:4:5 triangle, there's your answer. 3 and 4 The reason this is so, is because 3^2 + 4^2 = 5^2 (9 + 16 = 25) according to the Pythagorean Theorem, and 3 + 4 + 5 just so happens to equal 12.
The most important reason... The primary reason ...
According to biologists, the reason an empirical formula is not double that of the monosaccharide is because it loses one water molecule.
According to biologists, the reason an empirical formula is not double that of the monosaccharide is because it loses one water molecule.
a posteriori means it argues from experience (empirical evidence) to a conclusion. for example the design arguments claims that there is order in the world (experience) and then concludes that there must be a God who designed this (the conclusion)
theorem
Theorem
A superstition is any belief that is followed based on tradition and empirical evidence rather than a belief that is based on scientific testing, logic and reason: Any belief that relies on the existence of something supernatural for an explanation, it is a superstition.
A superstition is any belief that is followed based on tradition and empirical evidence rather than a belief that is based on scientific testing, logic and reason: Any belief that relies on the existence of something supernatural for an explanation, it is a superstition.
The Enlightenment is sometimes called the Age of Reason because it emphasized the use of reason, logic, and critical thinking as tools for understanding the world and shaping society. During this period, there was a strong focus on rationality, empirical evidence, and individual rights, leading to advancements in science, philosophy, and politics.
While the theorem is attributed to Pythagoras, there is reason to believe it was known much earlier. For example, megalithic sites that predate Pythagoras seem to have applied this knowledge.
The Enlightenment was called the Age of Reason because it emphasized the importance of using logic, reason, and empirical evidence to understand the world and solve problems. It marked a shift away from superstition, tradition, and religious authority in favor of rational thinking and scientific inquiry.
The paragigm shift from mystical life to measurable life The dawn of the age of REASON Empirical evidence ONLY no more gnosis The paragigm shift from mystical life to measurable life The dawn of the age of REASON Empirical evidence ONLY no more gnosis
Immanuel Kant believed that pure reason is limited in its ability to understand and know the world, as it is bound by the constraints of human cognition. He argued that pure reason alone cannot access fundamental truths about reality, and that a combination of reason and empirical observation is necessary for true understanding. This led Kant to develop his theory of transcendentally ideal knowledge, where knowledge is structured by the mind rather than being a direct representation of the world.