They are both as precise as the measuring tools. Precision is affected by the error introduced by the measurement or in a dimension, often known as the tolerance.
A measurement in inches has a greater resolution than one in feet. 12 times the resolution in fact. However, a measurement of 178 inches that can be up to 15% out is not as precise as a measurement of 12 feet with a 1% possible error.
Because in any given measurement, there are more of the smaller units than bigger units. There are less than 2 metres in my height (1.78 m). But in a smaller unit, eg centimetre, there are is 178 of them. That is a staggering 1780000 micrometres tall :) But, then again, that is only 0.00178 kilometres :(
25
The number 178 can be divided evenly by 1, 2, 89, and 178. These are the factors of 178, as they divide into 178 without leaving a remainder. Additionally, 178 is an even number, so it can also be divided by 2.
178
178/200 x 100 = 89% Check---- 200 x 89% = 178
That depends whether the thing you're measuring is closer to 178 inches or 12 feet.However, if you round to the nearest measurement, a measurement of 178 inches can be within 2.54 centimetres of accuracy, while a measurement of 12 feet can be within 15.24 centimetres of accuracy - therefore making inches a much more accurate measurement.
No. 12 ft is precise, because the definition of 1 ft tells us that it's precisely 12 inches. Incidentally, we're hoping that the question doesn't mean to imply that 178 inches are equal to 12 ft . . .
No. 333 is more than 178.
It usually looks like a number, followed by the units of measurement such as "1.78 metres" or "178 centimetres" or "5 foot 10 inches".
Probably there is somewhere in Saturn where the temperature is 178 degrees. At the surface it's probably more like -178 degrees.
you tell me
You cannot convert grammes to centimetres. Grammes is a unit of mass. Centimetres is a unit of length (linear measurement).
There are many more than 7 Roman emperors. In total there were 178 emperors. There were 81 of the west and 97 of the east.There are many more than 7 Roman emperors. In total there were 178 emperors. There were 81 of the west and 97 of the east.There are many more than 7 Roman emperors. In total there were 178 emperors. There were 81 of the west and 97 of the east.There are many more than 7 Roman emperors. In total there were 178 emperors. There were 81 of the west and 97 of the east.There are many more than 7 Roman emperors. In total there were 178 emperors. There were 81 of the west and 97 of the east.There are many more than 7 Roman emperors. In total there were 178 emperors. There were 81 of the west and 97 of the east.There are many more than 7 Roman emperors. In total there were 178 emperors. There were 81 of the west and 97 of the east.There are many more than 7 Roman emperors. In total there were 178 emperors. There were 81 of the west and 97 of the east.There are many more than 7 Roman emperors. In total there were 178 emperors. There were 81 of the west and 97 of the east.
15% of 178 = 15% * 178 = 0.15 * 178 = 26.7
They are: 2*89 = 178 and 1*178 = 178
30% of 178= 30% * 178= 0.3 * 178= 53.4
Because in any given measurement, there are more of the smaller units than bigger units. There are less than 2 metres in my height (1.78 m). But in a smaller unit, eg centimetre, there are is 178 of them. That is a staggering 1780000 micrometres tall :) But, then again, that is only 0.00178 kilometres :(