Best Answer

They are both as precise as the measuring tools. Precision is affected by the error introduced by the measurement or in a dimension, often known as the tolerance.

A measurement in inches has a greater resolution than one in feet. 12 times the resolution in fact. However, a measurement of 178 inches that can be up to 15% out is not as precise as a measurement of 12 feet with a 1% possible error.

Q: Tell which measurement is more precise 178 in or 12 ft?

Write your answer...

Submit

Still have questions?

Continue Learning about Other Math

Because in any given measurement, there are more of the smaller units than bigger units. There are less than 2 metres in my height (1.78 m). But in a smaller unit, eg centimetre, there are is 178 of them. That is a staggering 1780000 micrometres tall :) But, then again, that is only 0.00178 kilometres :(

25

178

It is: 178/9 times 9 = 178 or 19 and 7/9 times 9 = 178

178/200 x 100 = 89% Check---- 200 x 89% = 178

Related questions

That depends whether the thing you're measuring is closer to 178 inches or 12 feet.However, if you round to the nearest measurement, a measurement of 178 inches can be within 2.54 centimetres of accuracy, while a measurement of 12 feet can be within 15.24 centimetres of accuracy - therefore making inches a much more accurate measurement.

No. 12 ft is precise, because the definition of 1 ft tells us that it's precisely 12 inches. Incidentally, we're hoping that the question doesn't mean to imply that 178 inches are equal to 12 ft . . .

It usually looks like a number, followed by the units of measurement such as "1.78 metres" or "178 centimetres" or "5 foot 10 inches".

No. 333 is more than 178.

Probably there is somewhere in Saturn where the temperature is 178 degrees. At the surface it's probably more like -178 degrees.

You cannot convert grammes to centimetres. Grammes is a unit of mass. Centimetres is a unit of length (linear measurement).

you tell me

There are many more than 7 Roman emperors. In total there were 178 emperors. There were 81 of the west and 97 of the east.There are many more than 7 Roman emperors. In total there were 178 emperors. There were 81 of the west and 97 of the east.There are many more than 7 Roman emperors. In total there were 178 emperors. There were 81 of the west and 97 of the east.There are many more than 7 Roman emperors. In total there were 178 emperors. There were 81 of the west and 97 of the east.There are many more than 7 Roman emperors. In total there were 178 emperors. There were 81 of the west and 97 of the east.There are many more than 7 Roman emperors. In total there were 178 emperors. There were 81 of the west and 97 of the east.There are many more than 7 Roman emperors. In total there were 178 emperors. There were 81 of the west and 97 of the east.There are many more than 7 Roman emperors. In total there were 178 emperors. There were 81 of the west and 97 of the east.There are many more than 7 Roman emperors. In total there were 178 emperors. There were 81 of the west and 97 of the east.

Because in any given measurement, there are more of the smaller units than bigger units. There are less than 2 metres in my height (1.78 m). But in a smaller unit, eg centimetre, there are is 178 of them. That is a staggering 1780000 micrometres tall :) But, then again, that is only 0.00178 kilometres :(

15% of 178 = 15% * 178 = 0.15 * 178 = 26.7

30% of 178= 30% * 178= 0.3 * 178= 53.4

They are: 2*89 = 178 and 1*178 = 178