The sum of two numbers is 208.
x + y = 208
One third of the greater number equals the smallest number.
x / 3 = y
Substitute the value for "y" in the first equation:
x + (x/3) = 208
Multiply everything by 3:
3x + x = 624
Combine the values of x:
4x = 624
Divide by 4:
x = 156
Solve for y:
156 + y = 208
y = 208 - 156
y = 52
Technically, there is no such thing as "the smallest number" since we can go into negative numbers and they go on forever. But if we are talking about positive integers, then the smallest would be 1 1 plus zero equals one. The second smallest would be 2 2 plus 1 equals 3
There is no such number. If you give me any number and claim that it is the smallest number greater than 9.5, then the average of that number and 9.5 will be (a) greater than 9.5 and (b) smaller than the number you gave me. And the average of 9.5 and the new number will be a better candidate. And the average of 9.5 and that new number ...
52 is the smallest even number greater than 50.
The smallest number that rounds to 8000 is 7500. When rounding to the nearest thousand, numbers that are 500 or greater get rounded up. In this case, 7500 is the smallest number that, when rounded to the nearest thousand, becomes 8000.
The smallest prime number greater than 100 is 101. A prime number is a natural number greater than 1 that has no positive divisors other than 1 and itself. In this case, 101 is indivisible by any other numbers except for 1 and 101, making it a prime number.
2, if you're considering only positive numbers (numbers greater than 0) 0, if you're considering only non-negative numbers (numbers greater than or equal to 0) If negative numbers are allowed, then there is no smallest even number
The smallest is 29.
No, it's never greater than the smallest number.
49 and 51
The smallest prime number greater than 15 is 17. A prime number is a natural number greater than 1 that cannot be formed by multiplying two smaller natural numbers. In this case, 17 is indivisible by any other numbers except for 1 and itself, making it a prime number.
52 and 156.
No. Numbers are infinitely dense and that means there is never a "next" number. 98.61 is greater than 98.6 but smaller than 98.7 which claims to be smallest. 98.601 is greater than 98.6 but smaller than 98.61 which claims to be smallest. 98.6001 is greater than 98.6 but smaller than 98.601 which claims to be smallest. and so on, and on, and on.
No, it's never greater than the smallest number.
Technically, there is no such thing as "the smallest number" since we can go into negative numbers and they go on forever. But if we are talking about positive integers, then the smallest would be 1 1 plus zero equals one. The second smallest would be 2 2 plus 1 equals 3
There is no such number. If you give me any number and claim that it is the smallest number greater than 9.5, then the average of that number and 9.5 will be (a) greater than 9.5 and (b) smaller than the number you gave me. And the average of 9.5 and the new number will be a better candidate. And the average of 9.5 and that new number ...
1009 is the smallest prime number greater than 1000.
52 is the smallest even number greater than 50.