That isn't possible. The three consecutive number are assumed to be integers; the sum of three consecutive integers is always a multiple of 3 (try it out).
This is no set of three consecutive numbers that when multiplied equal 387.
71,72,73 :)
Do you mean:"What three consecutive numbers add up to 99?" If you do, then the numbers are 32, 33, 34.
nine, ten and eleven. Three consecutive numbers that total thirty
If you take three consecutive odd (or three consecutive even) numbers, one of the three will always be a multiple of 3.If you take three consecutive odd (or three consecutive even) numbers, one of the three will always be a multiple of 3.If you take three consecutive odd (or three consecutive even) numbers, one of the three will always be a multiple of 3.If you take three consecutive odd (or three consecutive even) numbers, one of the three will always be a multiple of 3.
That doesn't work. The number has to be divisible by three. Any three consecutive numbers add up to a multiple of three.
There are no such whole numbers. The sum of three consecutive whole numbers must be a multiple of 3; as 68 is not a multiple of 3 (68 = 3 × 22 2/3) it cannot be the sum of three whole numbers.
A multiple of 3 Also a multiple of 6.
That isn't possible. The three consecutive number are assumed to be integers; the sum of three consecutive integers is always a multiple of 3 (try it out).
There are no three consecutive numbers with a sum of 170.
There are no sets of three consecutive numbers totaling 118.
19, 20, 21
79
There are no three consecutive numbers that are squares. Otherwise, there are an infinite sets of squares of three consecutive numbers: for example, {1,4,9}, or {4,9,16} or {576, 625, 676}
Can't be done. The number has to be a multiple of 3.
This is no set of three consecutive numbers that when multiplied equal 387.