0
True or false if you took a true if then statement inserted a not in each clase and reversed the clauses the new staement would also be true?
Wiki User
∙ 7y ago
True. In that case, each of the statements is said to be the contrapositive of the other.
Wiki User
∙ 7y ago
Wiki User
∙ 7y agoYes, it is true.
Add your answer:
Earn +20 pts
If you took an if then statement inserted a not in each clause and reversed the clauses the new statement would also be true?
true
Is it true that if you took an if-then statement inserted a not in each clause and reversed the clauses the new statement would also be true?
If the conditional (if, then) is true, then the contrapositive (reversed; if not, then not) will be also true. And vice versa, if the conditional is false, its contrapositive will be also false. for example,If a graph passes the vertical line test, then it is a graph of a function. (True)If a graph is not a graph of a function, then it will not pass the vertical line test. (True)Yes, but only if the original if-then was true.
True or false If two independent clauses are connected by a semicolon, the dotted line is slanted from one verb to the other.?
False. The correct answer is "If two independent clauses are connected by a semicolon, the dotted line goes straight from one verb to the other." (A+)
What situations is it not appropriate to use a semicolon?
To replace a period at the end of a sentence To begin a list of elements contained within a sentence To join independent clauses when the second clause explains the first To replace the conjunctions and, or, or but and to connect the main clauses in a compound sentence
What is the converse of If n2 equals 64 then n equals 8?
Conditional statement: If n2 equals 64, then n equals 8, where n2 equals 64 is the hypothesis, and n equals 8 is the conclusion. In order to obtain the converse of the conditional we reverse the 2 clauses, then the original conclusion becomes the new hypothesis and the original hypothesis becomes the new conclusion. So that, Converse: If n equals 8, then n2 equals 64.
If you took an if then statement inserted a not in each clause and reversed the clauses the new statement would also be true?
true
True or false If you took an if-then statement inserted a not in each clause and reversed the clauses the new statement would also be true. A. True B. False?
True
True or false If you took a true if-then statement and reversed the clauses the new statement would also be true.?
The answer is false
Would the new statement also be true if you took an if-then statement and reversed the clauses?
No. For example, considerIf you dive into a pool then you will get wet.If you get wet then you will dive into the pool.In the second statement, apart from the chronology getting reversed, you could get wet by standing in the rain, or having a shower.
Is it true that if you took an if-then statement inserted a not in each clause and reversed the clauses the new statement would also be true?
If the conditional (if, then) is true, then the contrapositive (reversed; if not, then not) will be also true. And vice versa, if the conditional is false, its contrapositive will be also false. for example,If a graph passes the vertical line test, then it is a graph of a function. (True)If a graph is not a graph of a function, then it will not pass the vertical line test. (True)Yes, but only if the original if-then was true.
What is the difference between a statement and a clause in SQL?
An SQL statement is a complete set of clauses which returns a value and ends with a semicolon(;) A statement is made up of several clauses Ex: select * from person where f_name='me'; In this ex ' select * from person where f_name='me';' is the statement and select*, from person, where f_name= are the clauses
If you took a true if-then statement inserted a not in each clause and reversed the clauses the new statement would also be true.?
Ordinarily yes. This is called "contraposition" in formal logic :For any statement where A implies B, then not B always implies not A. Proving or disproving either one of these statements automatically proves or disproves the other.If A then B means that B is a subset of A, and anything not part of B cannot be part of A.However, some if-then or cause-effect statements, once made negative or reversed, represent an entirely different fact that may or may not be true.For example:"If I get the high score, then I will receive the award."would be true in contraposition if the award is based only on the score."If I do not receive the award, then I did not get the high score."However, if the award was denied on some other basis, the contraposition is not valid.The valid statement would be "If I get the high score, then I will definitely get the award."
If you took a true if then statement and inserted a not in each clause and reversed the clauses the new statement would also be true?
Ordinarily yes. This is called "contraposition" in formal logic :For any statement where A implies B, then not B always implies not A. Proving or disproving either one of these statements automatically proves or disproves the other.If A then B means that B is a subset of A, and anything not part of B cannot be part of A.However, some if-then or cause-effect statements, once made negative or reversed, represent an entirely different fact that may or may not be true.For example:"If I get the high score, then I will receive the award."would be true in contraposition if the award is based only on the score."If I do not receive the award, then I did not get the high score."However, if the award was denied on some other basis, the contraposition is not valid.The valid statement would be "If I get the high score, then I will definitely get the award."
How does a try statement determine which catch clause should be used to handle an exception?
When an exception is thrown within the body of a try statement, the catch clauses of the try statement are examined in the order in which they appear. The first catch clause that is capable of handling the exception that was thrown, is executed. The remaining catch clauses are ignored
And which clauses should be matched with and who clauses?
Relative clauses should be matched with "who" clauses, which serve as the subject of the sentence and provide additional information about a person. For example, "The man who won the race is my friend." In this sentence, "who won the race" is a relative clause that provides more detail about "the man."
What is a dependent clause'?
Dependent (subordinate) clauses are clauses that have a subject and a verb but cannot stand alone.An example is:When the cat ran under the car.This is a dependent clause because the word "when" makes the statement unable to stand on its own.
What is dependant clause?
Dependent (subordinate) clauses are clauses that have a subject and a verb but cannot stand alone.An example is:When the cat ran under the car.This is a dependent clause because the word "when" makes the statement unable to stand on its own.
