You need to show the equation. It makes a difference.
If the lines are in the form y = mx + c, the m values multiplied together should equal -1.Otherwise, the dot product of the two slope vectors should equal 0.
That is an impossible equation, because it is stating that m has two values.
1.2 l - 200 m = -198.8
Conversion of m to cm and mm: 1 m = 100 cm; 1 m = 1000 mmConversion of l to ml: 1 L = 1000 ml
m=8 l=6 y=4 m X m = 8 X 8 = 64 =ly m X l = 8 X 6 = 48 = ym
The relationship between ( ml ) and ( L ) depends on the specific context in which they are defined. If ( m ) is a coefficient or a variable that is multiplied by ( l ), then ( ml ) could be greater than, less than, or equal to ( L ), depending on the values of ( m ) and ( l ). Without additional context or definitions for ( m ) and ( L ), it's impossible to definitively compare them.
15
If l > m and m > n then l > n by the transitive property of inequality.
50 Roman numerical values: M=1000, D=500, C=100, L=50, X=10, V=5, I=1
Given any line L, with slope m, the perpendicular line has slope -m.
The magnetic quantum number ( m ) for f orbitals can take on integer values ranging from (-l) to (+l), where ( l ) is the azimuthal quantum number associated with f orbitals. For f orbitals, ( l = 3 ), so the possible values of ( m ) are (-3, -2, -1, 0, +1, +2, +3). This results in a total of seven possible values for ( m ).
l is greater than n
Wavelength (m)=Wave speed (m/s) /Frequency (Hz)
1 liter = 1,000 milliliters
The third quantum number, m, describes the orientation of the atomic orbital in space. It specifies the orientation of the orbital within a particular subshell. The values of m range from -l to +l, where l is the azimuthal quantum number.
If the lines are in the form y = mx + c, the m values multiplied together should equal -1.Otherwise, the dot product of the two slope vectors should equal 0.
m(I)=0 (apex)