It means that Gerrymandering is less easy.
Compact: Think of dropping a big spoonful of honey on a table. The result will be a round blob. We would say that the area of contact between the honey and the table is compact. In contrast, if you were to drop a spoonful of water from a couple of inches above the table it would splash out. There would be 'arms' of water that would spread out from the central wet area on the table. The area of contact between the water and the table would not be considered compact.
Contiguous: The city of New York is not contiguous. There's the mainland and there's Long Island, and these pieces are separated by salt water. In contrast the state of Idaho is contiguous--because it's all one big area.
Equal in population: obvious.
compact method is another word for column method
Compact Disc
A Theorem about Compact Spaces in Topology, a branch, out of eleven, of mathematics. A Theorem about Compact Spaces in Topology, a branch, out of eleven, of mathematics.
A sphere.
Exponents
Compact, contiguous, and about the same in population
large population and lack of space in the cities, the settlement is compact
districts must be equally populated. lines must be contiguous or connected. redistricting cannot dilute minority voting strength. district lines cannot be drawn solely based upon race. districts must be compact. communities of interest must be protected.
Divide 3.14 by the diametral pitch. Worm gears are a compact, efficient means of substantially decreasing speed and increasing torque.
LED lights use substantially less electricity than most other kinds of lighting -- even less than compact fluorescent bulbs.
Gerrymandering or drawing district lines to achieve favorable political results for one political party, remains a fact of American political life.It is controversial because...???
Sub compact is smaller than compact.
Membership in the House needed to be capped to prevent an excessive number of members.
what is a compact
A compact surface is a surface which is also a compact set. A compact surface has a triangulation with a finite number of triangles.
yes!The Reapportionment Act of 1929 (ch. 28, 46 Stat. 21, 2 U.S.C. § 2a, enacted June 18, 1929) was a combined census and reapportionment bill passed by the United States Congress that established a permanent method for apportioning a constant 435 seats in the U.S. House of Representatives according to each census. The bill neither repealed nor restated the requirements of the previous apportionment acts that districts be contiguous, compact, and equally populated.It was not clear whether these requirements were still in effect until in 1932 the Supreme Court of the United States ruled in Wood v. Broom[1] that the provisions of each apportionment act affected only the apportionment for which they were written. Thus the size and population requirements, last stated in the Apportionment Act of 1911, expired immediately with the enactment of the subsequent Apportionment Act.The Act of 1929 gave little direction concerning congressional redistricting. It merely established a system in which House seats would be reallocated to states which have shifts in population. The lack of recommendations concerning districts had several significant effects.The Reapportionment Act of 1929 allowed states to draw districts of varying size and shape. It also allowed states to abandon districts altogether and elect at least some representatives at large, which several states chose to do, including New York, Illinois, Washington, Hawaii, and New Mexico. For example, in the 88th Congress (in the early 1960s) 22 of the 435 representatives were elected at-large.The Reapportionment Act of 1929 (ch. 28, 46 Stat. 21, 2 U.S.C. § 2a, enacted June 18, 1929) was a combined census and reapportionment bill passed by the United States Congress that established a permanent method for apportioning a constant 435 seats in the U.S. House of Representatives according to each census. The bill neither repealed nor restated the requirements of the previous apportionment acts that districts be contiguous, compact, and equally populated.It was not clear whether these requirements were still in effect until in 1932 the Supreme Court of the United States ruled in Wood v. Broom[1] that the provisions of each apportionment act affected only the apportionment for which they were written. Thus the size and population requirements, last stated in the Apportionment Act of 1911, expired immediately with the enactment of the subsequent Apportionment Act.The Act of 1929 gave little direction concerning congressional redistricting. It merely established a system in which House seats would be reallocated to states which have shifts in population. The lack of recommendations concerning districts had several significant effects.The Reapportionment Act of 1929 allowed states to draw districts of varying size and shape. It also allowed states to abandon districts altogether and elect at least some representatives at large, which several states chose to do, including New York, Illinois, Washington, Hawaii, and New Mexico. For example, in the 88th Congress (in the early 1960s) 22 of the 435 representatives were elected at-large.
The Mayflower Compact established a tradition of direct democracy.