Sodium (Na)
50,0000 bytes
Cot(90) = 0 so 1/cot(90), if defined, would be 1/0. Such a fraction is not defined and that is what is wrong with the sentence.
This is a question of probability; often, probabilities are expressed and solved using fractions.
It depends on how I is defined.
Fe
OX OO XO XX
50,0000 bytes
exactly...
Cot(90) = 0 so 1/cot(90), if defined, would be 1/0. Such a fraction is not defined and that is what is wrong with the sentence.
This is a question of probability; often, probabilities are expressed and solved using fractions.
The atomic number of an element equals the number of protons in the element.
This is an equivalence relation that contains elements of the natural numbers together with an element (denoted by the symbol x) that is defined by some extension of N.
the sum of the upper quartile and lower quartile is 56 and their difference is 24. find upper quartile and lower quartile.
No. It isn't defined that way.
Because that is how a yard is defined!Because that is how a yard is defined!Because that is how a yard is defined!Because that is how a yard is defined!
It is impossible to give the value of t when it is not defined.
Starting with the information that is given: Two options, due to the lack of punctuation: a=1b=2z=26 -or- a=1 b=2 z=36 p=(not defined) q=(not defined) r=(not defined) Therefore, all we can assert from the given information is that p+q+r = p+q+r (the variables can be rearranged without altering the (unknown) value, because of the commutative property of addition. a, b and z are not used in the equation, so their values are irrelevant. p, q and r are not defined, so we cannot assume any value for any of the variables in the equation. Well, we could assume, but it would be just that - an assumption, and an unfounded assumption at that. There was not enough information provided to draw any more concrete conclusion.