0.65 rounded to the nearest tenth is 0.7. When rounding to the nearest tenth, we look at the digit in the hundredths place, which is 5 in this case. Since 5 is equal to or greater than 5, we round up the digit in the tenths place, which is 6 in this instance. Therefore, 0.65 rounded to the nearest tenth is 0.7.
It is 0.6.
Although many schools teach you to round 5 up, the IEEE (Institute of Electronic and Electrical Engineers) standard 754 is to round up or down so that the new last digit is even. See link for more.
The problem with always rounding up from 5 (or more is that it introduces an upward bias. Thus,
If the number is 0.0 you don't need to round
If the number is 0.1, 0.2, 0.3 or 0.4 you round down
If the number is 0.5, 0.6, 0.7, 0.8 or 0.9 you round up
So for a random last digit, 5 times out of 10 you round up and 4 times out of 10n you round down: (and one out of ten is no change). The net result is an upward bias
One possible solution is to round up from 0.5 half the time, round down the other half. That satisfies the bias problem but introduces another - that of reproducibility. If someone else were to look at your data would they round up/down the same way you did? Unlikely. You need a system which will round 0.5 up half the time and down half the time but where the decision is made for you.
Hence the best solution is the answer given above: Round up or down so that the new last digit is even.
Well, isn't that a happy little number! When we round 5.167 to the nearest tenth, we look at the digit in the hundredths place, which is 6. Since 6 is greater than 5, we round up the tenths place, making it 5.2. And just like that, we have a beautifully rounded number!
65.6
It is then 52.8 when rounded to the nearest tenth
It is then 56.5 when rounded to the nearest tenth
It is 232.4 when rounded to the nearest tenth
It is then 20.2 when rounded to the nearest tenth
It is 0.8 when rounded to the nearest tenth
4.4
10775.9
2.7
54.4
28.6