No.
1700 → 1700 to the nearest hundred.
It is divisible by 3, for example.It is divisible by 3, for example.It is divisible by 3, for example.It is divisible by 3, for example.
It's false because we have numbers that is divisible by 10 but not divisible by 5 and vice versa, we have numbers that is divisible by 10 but not divisible by 5.
If this is a T-F question, the answer is false. It is true that if a number is divisible by 6, it also divisible by 3. This is true because 6 is divisible by 3. However, the converse -- If a number is divisible by 3, it is divisible by 6, is false. A counterexample is 15. 15 is divisible by 3, but not by 6. It becomes clearer if you split the question into its two parts. A number is divisible by 6 if it is divisible by 3? False. It must also be divisible by 2. A number is divisible by 6 only if it is divisible by 3? True.
1709 is a prime number. Its only factors are 1 and 1709.
By 1 and itself.
Itself and any of its multiples
No.
1709 was the 18th century.
1 and 1709
1709
No because 1709 is in the past.
17 March 1709 was a Thursday.
September 10, 1709 was a Tuesday.
1709 can only be divided by itself and one because it is a prime number
1709