answersLogoWhite

0


Best Answer

19.8889

User Avatar

Vergie Moen

Lvl 10
3y ago
This answer is:
User Avatar

Add your answer:

Earn +20 pts
Q: What is 179 divided by 9 as estimating quotient from compatible numbers?
Write your answer...
Submit
Still have questions?
magnify glass
imp
Related questions

How can estimating with compatible numbers help you find the quotient?

it makes it easier when u round


How can you use compatible numbers to estimate the quotient for 1089 divided by 99?

11


How does one estimate a quotient using compatible numbers?

The best way to estimate a quotient using compatible numbers is to first understand how compatible numbers work. They are numbers that are close in value to the actual numbers and are easily added, subtracted or divided.


How do you Estimate quotient by using compatible numbers 5391 divided by 77?

70.013


How can i use compatible numbers to estimate the quotient of 925 divided by 29?

31.8966


76.5 divided by 8.8 in compatible numbers to estimate each quotient?

8.6932


Use compatible numbers to estimate the quotient of 3611 divided by 47?

76.8298


How do you estimate quotient using compatible numbers for 566 divided by 81?

6.9877


What is 3512 divided by 9 estimating compatible numbers?

390.2222


What is the quotient of negative numbers being divided?

The quotient will be positive.


What is 5391 divided by 77 estimated using compatible numbers?

70.013


What do they mean when they say estimate each quotient write the compatible numbers you used?

Suppose you are asked to evaluate a quotient like 923/462. You have several options. You could choose 900 and 500 as compatible numbers for the two given numbers and then your estimated quotient would be 900/500 = 1.8. Or You could choose 920 and 460 as the compatible numbers for them and then your estimated quotient would be 920/460 = 2.0. So the question is essentially, what compatible numbers did you pick and using them, what was the quotient. There is no correct answer to picking compatible numbers. Any estimation is a trade-off between simplicity and accuracy. Incidentally, a more accurate answer is 1.9978 (approx), but even that is not perfect!