The expression in the question contains two decimal points and so cannot be a number.
that is expanded form but you can also write it in scientific notation which would be 6.09 x10^2
Done!
no
your already have it in scientific notation... 6.25*10-5 In standard notation it looks like this... 0.0000625 In expanded notation it looks like this... 0.00006 + 0.000002 + 0.0000005 In word form it looks like this... six hundred five ten-millionths
14.95 in expanded notation
It is: 7,480,000,000 or as 7.48*109 in scientific notation
Expanded: 125,000,000,000 Scientific:1.25*1011
You mean, scientific notation of 186000? 1.86*105
1357 is in expanded form. In scientific notation or standard form it would be 1.357 x 103.
Expanded Notation: (2 x 10000) + (8 x 1000) + (2 x 100) + (5 x 10) + (0 x 1)Scientific Notation: 2.825 x 10^4Standard Notation: 28,250
387.Standard notation is our regular system of writing numbers. So, 387 is already in standard notation! Other kinds of notation include scientific notation and expanded notation.
If you mean scientific notation, it is 1.04812 x 105.
that is expanded form but you can also write it in scientific notation which would be 6.09 x10^2
1.115*10^5... or, when expanded, 111,500 The number you gave in the question was in scientific notation. Unless it was a multiplication of 1.115*105 1.115*105=117.075=1.117075*10^2
This is a number written in scientific notation, which expanded would equal 4,538,000,000.
6820 is already written in standard notation. The same number is6.82 x 103 written in scientific notation6000 + 800 +20 + 0 written in expanded notation (1)(6x103) + (8x102) + (2x101) + (0x100) written in expanded notation (2)(6x1000) + (8x100) + (2x10) + (0x1) written in expanded notation (3)6(1000) + 8(100) + 2(10) + 0(1) written in expanded notation (4)
Done!