460.
Some people will say 470 but there is a problem with that. Round up or down so that the new last digit is even.
Rationale:
Some people advise you to round up 0.5. Others say round down. The problem with either approach is as follows:
In the first case
If the number is 0.0 you don't need to round
If the number is 0.1, 0.2, 0.3 or 0.4 you round down
If the number is 0.5, 0.6, 0.7, 0.8 or 0.9 you round up
So 4 downs and 5 ups (and one no change).
Net Result: you introduce an upward bias.
In the second scenario, you introduce a downward bias through rounding.
Possible solution:
Round up from 0.5 half the time, round down the other half. That satisfies the bias problem but introduces another - that of reproducibility. If someone else were to look at your data would they round up/down the same way you did? Unlikely. You need a system which will round 0.5 up half the time and down half the time but where the decision is made for you.
Hence the best solution is the answer given above: Round up or down so that the new last digit is even.
465 rounded to the nearest ten is 470. 465 rounded to the nearest hundred is 500.
Well, honey, if you want to round 465 to the nearest ten, you just look at the digit in the tens place, which is 6. Since 6 is greater than 5, you round up. So, 465 rounded to the nearest ten is 470. Voila!
465.00
0
It is then 740 when rounded to the nearest ten.
465 rounded to the nearest ten is 470. 465 rounded to the nearest hundred is 500.
460
Well, honey, if you want to round 465 to the nearest ten, you just look at the digit in the tens place, which is 6. Since 6 is greater than 5, you round up. So, 465 rounded to the nearest ten is 470. Voila!
465.00
464 centiliters rounded to the nearest liter is 4.7.
0
0
465.0
It is then 740 when rounded to the nearest ten.
rounded to the nearest ten... it would be 420.
It is 2350 when rounded to the nearest ten
30.089 rounded to the nearest ten is 30.