Oh, dude, okay, so like, technically speaking, 0 is bigger than -2 because 0 is like, neutral, it's just hanging out in the middle, not trying to be negative or positive, you know? And -2, well, it's like, negative, it's going in the opposite direction. So, yeah, 0 takes the win in this super thrilling battle of numbers.
Well, darling, in the world of numbers, negative numbers are like the Debbie Downers of the bunch. So, when it comes to comparing 0 and -2, 0 struts in like a boss and takes the crown for being bigger. It's like comparing a plain bagel to a moldy one - one is just empty while the other is straight-up negative.
13 is bigger because even though both have 2 digits the 0 at the very end does not count so 05 is classified as 5.
yes
No, they are equal. It's the same as asking if 2+0 is more than 2.
0.9 is bigger.
Any NEGATIVE number is SMALLER then 0, or less in value(-1,-2,-3...) BUT COUNTING numbers are GREATER than 0 (1,2,3...)
2
rock paper sciser
2 is bigger.
0 is larger than -2.
Yes
0 is bigger
The answer is a number bigger than 0 and less than 2
0 is bigger than -3
019 is bigger than 0.
2
It is 0. Think of dividing 2 by a very big number. For example, 2/20000000000= 1/10000000000 which is very close to 0. As the denominator gets bigger and bigger, the quotient approaches 0. In the limit it is 0. Remember infinity is not really a number. In this case it means, letting the denominator get as big as it can. Another way to think of or write this this is lim n-->0 of 2/n=0
13 is bigger because even though both have 2 digits the 0 at the very end does not count so 05 is classified as 5.