A variable, Y, is in direct square variation with a variable, X, if Y = kX2 where k is some (non-zero) constant.
if one increases.., .....so does the other....
fdbfd
Direct variation is not a special case.
If a variable X is in inverse variation with a variable Y, then it is in direct variation with the variable (1/Y).
A variable, Y, is in direct square variation with a variable, X, if Y = kX2 where k is some (non-zero) constant.
if one increases.., .....so does the other....
fdbfd
Two variables, X and Y, are in direct variation if Y = kX for some constant k. The graph of Y as a function of X will be a straight line through the origin.
one quantity varies directly as the square of the other quantity. in symbols, y = kx squared
A direct variation (!) or direct reelationship.
Direct variation is not a special case.
Yes, it is direct variation.
No, it is not a direct variation.
I have recently been doing all these direct variation problems but not every linear relationship is a direct variation... But every direct variation is a linear relation!
If a variable X is in inverse variation with a variable Y, then it is in direct variation with the variable (1/Y).
Direct variation is the ratio of two variable is constant. Inverse variation is when the product of two variable is constant. For example, direct variation is y = kx and indirect variation would be y = k/x .