The rules for "standard radical form" are that (a) there should be no perfect square within the radical sign; for example, square root of 12 is equal to square root of 4 x square root of 3 = 2 x square root of 3, and should be written as the latter; and (b) there should be no radical sign in the denominator. For example, if you have 1 / square root of 2, you multiply top and bottom by the square root of 2, to get a square root in the numerator, but none in the denominator.
Chat with our AI personalities
2.018606997in radical form??
294 is an integer and there is no sensible radical form for it.
'Standard form' in algebra refers to a way of structuring (phrasing) an equation: Ax+By=C. 'Three tenths' is not an equation, though it may be part of the solution to an equation.
2i radical 5 * * * * * No. it is ± i*radical(25) which is ± 5i. Not sure why the answer is requireed in radical form.
48 does not need to be put in radical form. But, it can be: √2304