No.The cube of 3 is 27 and the cube of 4 is 64 so 44 isn't a cube number.
The least number that can be added to 60 to obtain a perfect cube is 4. Add 4 to get 64 whose cube root is 4
Since 64 is 4³, the next cube number is 5³ = 125.
cube of 1, cube of 2,cube of 3, cube of 4, cube of 5
Edge of the larger cube = 32 cm Volume of the larger cube = (32 cm)3 = 32768 cm3 Edge of the smaller cube = 4 cm Volume of the smaller cube = (4 cm)3 = 64 cm3 Since the smaller cubes are cut from the larger cube, volume of all of them will be equal to that of the larger cube. ∴ Total number of smaller cubes × Volume of the smaller cube = Volume of the larger cube ⇒ Total number of smaller cubes = Volume of the larger cube ÷ Volume of the smaller cube ⇒ Total number of smaller cubes = 32768 ÷ 64 = 512 Thus, 512 smaller cubes can be cut from the larger one.
The cube of a number occurs when three of that number have been multiplied together - This is also referred to as 'raising to the power of 3'. So. 4 x 4 x 4 = 64 is 4 cubed (or 43). The cube root of a number is the number whose cube equals the given number. So, the cube root of 64 is 4, (as 4 cubed equals 64).
No.The cube of 3 is 27 and the cube of 4 is 64 so 44 isn't a cube number.
No.
If you multiplied a number by 4, then the cube of the number would be increased by a factor of 16.
The least number that can be added to 60 to obtain a perfect cube is 4. Add 4 to get 64 whose cube root is 4
4
Since 64 is 4³, the next cube number is 5³ = 125.
· it has 2 digits · it is a square number (8 x 8 = 64) · it is a cube number (4 x 4 x 4 = 64)
4
No 3 cubed is 27 4 cubed is 64 Strictly it is the cube of the cube root of 28. The common description is that it is not a perfect cube.
cube of 1, cube of 2,cube of 3, cube of 4, cube of 5
Four. 4 = square of 2 Double of 4 = 8.... 8 is cube of 2