0
Still curious? Ask our experts.
Chat with our AI personalities
Lao
Coach
BlakeAdd your answer:
Earn +20 pts
What is the difference between 4t and 4 reg?
Size 4 are longer and slimmer than 4T. 4T is cut more for a toddler and allows room for a diaper.
Does a star have rotational symmetry?
if it is a reg. star, yes it does!:)
Someone have a license key for reg cure 1.5.2?
Thank
How parallel case and full cases problems are avoided in System Verilog?
The full_case and parallel_case directives are dangerous because they tell the synthesis tool something different about the design than what is told to the simulator. To the Verilog simulator, full_case and parallel_case are buried inside of Verilog comments and are completely ignored. To the synthesis tool, full_case and parallel_case are command-directives that instruct the synthesis tools to potentially take certain actions or perform certain optimizations that are unknown to the simulator. A full case statement is a case statement in which all possible case-expression binary patterns can be matched to a case item or to a case default. e.g. Full case, sel=2'b11 will be covered by default statement. The x-assignment will also be treated as a don'tcare for synthesis, which may allow the synthesis tool to further optimize the synthesized design. It's the potentially causing a mismatch to occur between simulation and synthesis. To insure that the pre-synthesis and post-synthesis simulations match, the case default could assign the y-output to either a predetermined constant value, or to one of the other multiplexer input values module mux3c (output reg y, input [1:0] sel, input a, b, c); always @* case (sel) 2'b00: y = a; 2'b01: y = b; 2'b10: y = c; default: y = 1'bx; endcase endmodule // Use synopsys full_case statement to create the full case , but it treated differently in simulation and synthesis. module mux3b (y, a, b, c, sel); (output reg y, input [1:0] sel, input a, b, c); always @* case (sel) // synopsys full_case 2'b00: y = a; 2'b01: y = b; 2'b10: y = c; endcase endmodule SystemVerilog use priority modified case statement to solve the full case problem. The biggest difference between a full_case directive and a priority modified case statement is that the priority keyword is part of the SystemVerilog syntax that will be interpreted the same by simulators, synthesis tools and formal verification tools. In essence, the priority case statement is a "safe" full_case case statement. e.g. priority case (...) ... endcase A parallel case statement is a case statement in which it is only possible to match any case expression to one and only one case item. e.g. A parallel case statement module intctl1b (output reg int2, int1, int0, input [2:0] irq ); always @* begin {int2, int1, int0} = 3'b0; casez (irq) // synopsys parallel_case 3'b1??: int2 = 1'b1; 3'b?1?: int1 = 1'b1; 3'b??1: int0 = 1'b1; endcase end endmodule This is an example that demonstrates that adding the parallel_case directive makes the design smaller and faster, but in the process it also adversely changes the functionality of the design. SystemVerilog adds the new case statement modifier called "unique." The unique keyword shall cause the simulator to report a run-time error if a case expression is ever found to match more than one of the case items. In essence, the unique case statement is a "safe" parallel_case case statement. unique case (...) ... default: ... endcase Guideline: Code all intentional priority encoders using if-else-if statements. It is easier for the typical design engineer to recognize a priority encoder when it is coded as an if-else-if statement.
