Oh, dude, .35 is a rational number because it can be expressed as a ratio of two integers. In this case, you can write it as 35/100, which simplifies to 7/20. So, like, .35 is totally rational because it's got a simple integer ratio hiding underneath its decimal disguise.
23
35 is an integer and not a fraction. However, it can be expressed in rational form as 35/1. You can then calculate equivalent rational fractions if you multiply both, its numerator and denominator, by any non-zero integer.
The fraction 23/35 is halfway. 3/5 = 21/35 5/7 = 25/35
61/2 - 27/8 = 13/2 - 23/8 = 52/8 - 23/8 = 29/8 = 35/861/2 - 27/8 = 13/2 - 23/8 = 52/8 - 23/8 = 29/8 = 35/861/2 - 27/8 = 13/2 - 23/8 = 52/8 - 23/8 = 29/8 = 35/861/2 - 27/8 = 13/2 - 23/8 = 52/8 - 23/8 = 29/8 = 35/8
NO. 35 is a rational number.
No it is not.
No. Not only is it rational, it is an integer.
Yes. It's the ratio of 35 to 1 .
It is Irrational. If you have an infinite number of decimals that doesn't have a specific pattern, then it is rational!
Oh, dude, .35 is a rational number because it can be expressed as a ratio of two integers. In this case, you can write it as 35/100, which simplifies to 7/20. So, like, .35 is totally rational because it's got a simple integer ratio hiding underneath its decimal disguise.
35% is rational
35/8 is a rational number.
0.35 is a rational number because it can be expressed as a fraction in the form of 7/20 in its lowest terms.
It can be expressed in the form 35/100 which is a ratio of two integers.
Only 35 is a composite number; the rest are prime numbers.
23 and a third