The two square numbers that add up to 169 are 64 and 105. To find this, you can start by listing out the square numbers starting from 1 until you find the pair that adds up to 169. Alternatively, you can solve this algebraically by setting up the equation x^2 + y^2 = 169 and finding the values of x and y that satisfy this equation.
169
if p² = 169, then p = ±√169 In other words, take the square root of 169 and p is either the positive or negative value of the square root.
this is a pythagorean triple and c2=169 so c=13 25+144=169=132
28,561 is.
no, 12 squared is 144 and 13 squared is 169. so no it is not a perfect square
Oh, dude, it's like this magical thing where you take 13, and then you like, multiply it by itself. So, 13 times 13 is basically 13 groups of 13, which equals 169. It's like math, but with a sprinkle of wizardry.
194
841 - 13...
No, but 14 squared is 196 and 13 squared is 169 those are the nearest square numbers.
The two square numbers that add up to 169 are 64 and 105. To find this, you can start by listing out the square numbers starting from 1 until you find the pair that adds up to 169. Alternatively, you can solve this algebraically by setting up the equation x^2 + y^2 = 169 and finding the values of x and y that satisfy this equation.
The 13th square number = 13 x 13 = 169
It is 13 squared, but it's not a triangular number
you have to do 7 squared + 13 squared = x squared. 7 squared is 49 + 13 squared which is 169. 169+49=x squared. 218= x squared. The square root of 218 is about 14.765. So the answer should be about 15cm if the missing side is the hypotnus (the diaganal side)
169
Oh, dude, the square of -13 is 169. Like, negative times negative equals positive, so when you square a negative number, it becomes positive. So, yeah, -13 squared equals 169. Easy peasy, lemon squeezy.
The square root of 175 is 13.23 (2 decimal places) so it is not a perfect square number. The closest perfect squares are 169 (13 squared) and 196 (14 squared).