3 + P = 8 Therefore: P = 8 - 3 P = 5
-3p > 105 divide both sides by -3 and remember that when multiplying or dividing by a negative number, you reverse the sense of the inequality: p < -35 To check to make sure the answer makes sense, select a value of p that is less than -35. For example, -100: (-3)(-100) > 105 300 > 105 which is true.
19999555
P<12
Sum of the sides ie 8+8+3+3 = 22m. p=2l+2w thus, p=2(8m)+2(3m) p=16m+6m p=22m so the perimeter is 22m. yrevoj.
It is an inequality than can be solved for p: 5 ≥ p - 3 → p - 3 ≤ 5 → p ≤ 8 So any value less than, or equal to, 8 will do for p.
(p - 4)3 is an expression, not an equation nor inequality. It can, therefore, have no answer.
3 + P = 8 Therefore: P = 8 - 3 P = 5
4p+3 = -6p-5 4p+6p = -5-3 10p = -8 p = -0.8 Substituting the value of p into the original equation gives you: -1/5 = -1/5
-3p > 105 divide both sides by -3 and remember that when multiplying or dividing by a negative number, you reverse the sense of the inequality: p < -35 To check to make sure the answer makes sense, select a value of p that is less than -35. For example, -100: (-3)(-100) > 105 300 > 105 which is true.
19999555
eight £0.08 = 8 pence
It is p <= 0.
Q=3-P Q=7-P If Q is a private good, MC=8, how much is optimal?
Given p=2−a to prove a 3 +6ap+p 3 −8=0...(1) Now put the value of P in eq (1) a 3 +6a(2−a)+(2−a) 3 −8=0 ⇒a 3 +12a−6a 2 +8−a 3 −12a+6a 2 −8=0 [∴(a−b) 3 =a 3 −b 3 −3a 2 b+3ab 2 ] ⇒0=0 (By eliminating equal terms we have LHS = RHS)
If you mean 8 -2p = 4 then the value of p is 2
The only possible value of p is 3.