No. If an input in a function had more than one output, that would be a mapping, but not a function.
It is possible.
By definition. If one input has more than one outputs then it is not a function.
A table in which you put in a number and out comes another number. Usually more than one groups of numbers. And almost ALWAYS follows a rule such as: Input x3=Output or Input -23= Output Input | Output 2 | 4 10 | 20 16 | 32 In this table you can see that the rule is Input x2 = Output Hope This helped!
No.
Input energy is typically more useful than output energy because input energy is the initial energy put into a system to produce the desired output. Output energy, on the other hand, is the energy produced by the system after losses and inefficiencies have occurred, so it is usually less than the input energy. By maximizing input energy efficiency, we can achieve a more effective output.
No. A function has only one output per input.
Work output can never be more than work input. That's a law of nature. In the real world, it's always less.
No. If an input in a function had more than one output, that would be a mapping, but not a function.
Output power can never be more than input power. With a transformer, it is possible to increase the output current (while decreasing the output voltage), or to decrease the output current (while increasing the output voltage).
Output is always greater than input. The output is multiplied from input.
No, it is not. A function can only have one output per input. (If it has more than one, it is still maths, but it cannot be called a "function". It would probably be called an equation or a formula etc...).
it is possible
It is possible.
it is possible
By definition. If one input has more than one outputs then it is not a function.
Why input current of USis less than Output current?