Yes, they do exist.
"if a triangle is an equilateral triangle" is a conditional clause, it is not a statement. There cannot be an inverse statement.
A triangle with sides of length 5,6, and 7 is a Scalene triangle.It cannot be an equilateral triangle as all three sides must be of equal length.It cannot be an isosceles triangle as this requires two sides of the same length.It cannot be a right angled triangle as 52 + 62 does not equal 72.
No, a triangle cannot have more than one obtuseangle.
A 3-D TRIANGLE cannot have 5 sides.
A straight triangle cannot exist.
You cannot. An isosceles triangle cannot be scalene and a scalene triangle cannot be isosceles. So an isosceles scalene triangle cannot exist.
A triangle, by definition, can have only three sides. So a four sided triangle simply cannot exist!A triangle, by definition, can have only three sides. So a four sided triangle simply cannot exist!A triangle, by definition, can have only three sides. So a four sided triangle simply cannot exist!A triangle, by definition, can have only three sides. So a four sided triangle simply cannot exist!
It does nothing. Because it cannot exist.
None. A square triangle is an oxymoron - it cannot exist!
None. A square triangle is an oxymoron - it cannot exist!
The main difference is that a triangle rectangle cannot exist.
It is a self-contradictory phrase and such a shape cannot exist.
Such a triangle cannot exist in 2 dimensions, the normal domain in which triangles are defined.
in which the sum of two sides less than or equal to the third side.
No. It is not possible, because a triangle cannot have a side longer than the sum of two other sides. 5 is greater than 2+2. Therefore the triangle cannot exist.
A quadrilateral triangle is an oxymoron.A quadrilateral has four sides, a triangle has three so a quadrilateral triangle cannot exist. You could therefore say that it has zero sides.