Wiki User
∙ 15y agoUsing common sense, either the people are very very small or the dimensions of the box is wrong!
Wiki User
∙ 15y agoThe answer depends entirely on how the dimensions change. It is possible to change the dimensions without changing the perimeter. It is also possible to change the dimensions without changing the area. (And it is possible to change the area without changing the perimeter.)
what are the quaities of a painting without depth or the illusion of three dimension
Impossible to determine without more information.
240 m3 - without using a calculator !
Most people will, without hesitation, say a rectangle. In actual fact, though, the paper DOES have a thickness. If it did not, then a stack of dollar bills would still have no height. So, at a very fine level of detail, it is shaped like a rectangular prism.
It is not possible to answer this question without knowing the shape of the field - circular, triangular, rectangular, etc.
It is impossible to answer the question without knowing what the "64 feet" refers to. The perimeter, or a misstated measure of area.
The answer depends on the dimensions of the garden as well as how wide the fence panels are. Without the information, it is pointless to try and answer the question.
The volume of the given dimensions cannot be determined without knowing the shape they correspond to. If these dimensions represent the three sides of a rectangular prism, the volume can be calculated by multiplying the three dimensions together (1.27cm x 1.3cm x 2.5cm = 4.1625 cubic centimeters).
The answer depends entirely on how the dimensions change. It is possible to change the dimensions without changing the perimeter. It is also possible to change the dimensions without changing the area. (And it is possible to change the area without changing the perimeter.)
The author of "Lifeboat Ethics" uses the lifeboat metaphor to illustrate the concept of limited resources and the idea that not everyone can be saved without consequences. By framing the essay in this way, the author sets up the ethical dilemma of how to allocate resources in a world with finite means.
It is not possible to answer the question because:there is no such word as rectangler.the nearest alternative is rectangular, but that is an adjective, not a noun. That leaves the question without a subject. A rectangular pyramid, a rectangular prism, rectangular dipyramid, rectangular antipyramid? Who can say?
There is no such word as "rectangler". Rectangular, on the other hand, is an adjective and without a related noun in the question it is impossible to answer. For example, there are different numbers of edges on a rectangular plane figure, a rectangular pyramid, a rectangular prism, a rectangular bipyramid.
The volume of the prism (not prisim) depends on its shape. Information about the dimensions (not demensions) is not enough without knowing the shape of the cross section: circular, triangular, rectangular etc.
Cubes, rectangular prisms, and cylinders are solid shapes that can be stacked up repeatedly to fill space without leaving gaps. These shapes can tessellate in three dimensions to create a continuous structure.
We can't tell without more information. All we know is that when all three dimensions (length in ft, width in ft, height in ft) are multiplied together, the result is 1.2 We're not even so sure of that much, since you haven't told us that the box is a rectangular solid, i.e. all of its inside angles are right angles. It could be a hat-box or pill-box; then, it only has 2 dimensions.
To inflate something is to fill it with air. You can do that with an air pump, yes. Some things can be inflated without pumps, such as hot air balloons. And some pumps don't pump air.