No,but 120 is and 301 isn't
If you define a rectangular number as a number which is the product of two consecutive integers, none of them qualify.
If you define a rectangular number as a number which is the product of two consecutive integers, none of them qualify.
A rectangular number is any number greater than or equal to 2, that is the product of an positive integer n multiplied by the integer that comes before it. So 2x1 for example or 5x4 or 10x111. If you look at the number 93120301=n(n+1), this number is rectangular if n^2+n-93120301=0 has a solution that is a positive integer. There is no integer solution so that number is not rectangular. How about 93? n^2+n-93=0 also has no solution in the natural numbers.
0.2583
301 * * * * * Actually, all three are.
No,but 120 is and 301 isn't
If you define a rectangular number as a number which is the product of two consecutive integers, none of them qualify.
If you define a rectangular number as a number which is the product of two consecutive integers, none of them qualify.
A rectangular number is any number greater than or equal to 2, that is the product of an positive integer n multiplied by the integer that comes before it. So 2x1 for example or 5x4 or 10x111. If you look at the number 93120301=n(n+1), this number is rectangular if n^2+n-93120301=0 has a solution that is a positive integer. There is no integer solution so that number is not rectangular. How about 93? n^2+n-93=0 also has no solution in the natural numbers.
The GCF of 93 and 120 is 3.
Factors of 120... 1,2,3,4,6,10,12,20,30,40,60,120 - Factors of 93... 1,3,31,93... therefore the GCF is 3
The LCM of 52, 93, and 120 is 3720
0.2583
108
Well, honey, if the height is 4 cubes, that leaves you with 12 cubes to work with for the base. You can arrange those 12 cubes in various ways to form different rectangular prisms. So, technically speaking, there are multiple rectangular prisms you can create with 48 cubes and a height of 4 cubes.
93 is composite, 3x31=93