No,but 120 is and 301 isn't
If you define a rectangular number as a number which is the product of two consecutive integers, none of them qualify.
If you define a rectangular number as a number which is the product of two consecutive integers, none of them qualify.
A rectangular number is any number greater than or equal to 2, that is the product of an positive integer n multiplied by the integer that comes before it. So 2x1 for example or 5x4 or 10x111. If you look at the number 93120301=n(n+1), this number is rectangular if n^2+n-93120301=0 has a solution that is a positive integer. There is no integer solution so that number is not rectangular. How about 93? n^2+n-93=0 also has no solution in the natural numbers.
0.2583
301 * * * * * Actually, all three are.
No,but 120 is and 301 isn't
If you define a rectangular number as a number which is the product of two consecutive integers, none of them qualify.
If you define a rectangular number as a number which is the product of two consecutive integers, none of them qualify.
A rectangular number is any number greater than or equal to 2, that is the product of an positive integer n multiplied by the integer that comes before it. So 2x1 for example or 5x4 or 10x111. If you look at the number 93120301=n(n+1), this number is rectangular if n^2+n-93120301=0 has a solution that is a positive integer. There is no integer solution so that number is not rectangular. How about 93? n^2+n-93=0 also has no solution in the natural numbers.
The GCF of 93 and 120 is 3.
Factors of 120... 1,2,3,4,6,10,12,20,30,40,60,120 - Factors of 93... 1,3,31,93... therefore the GCF is 3
The LCM of 52, 93, and 120 is 3720
0.2583
108
93
93 is composite, 3x31=93