0
There are lots of situations that are not modelled by exponential functions. A simple example is when something increases linearly. For example, assuming you have a fixed daily income, and save all of it, the amount of money you have is directly proportional to the number of days worked. No exponential function there, whatsoever.
There are lots of situations that are not modelled by exponential functions. A simple example is when something increases linearly. For example, assuming you have a fixed daily income, and save all of it, the amount of money you have is directly proportional to the number of days worked. No exponential function there, whatsoever.
There are lots of situations that are not modelled by exponential functions. A simple example is when something increases linearly. For example, assuming you have a fixed daily income, and save all of it, the amount of money you have is directly proportional to the number of days worked. No exponential function there, whatsoever.
There are lots of situations that are not modelled by exponential functions. A simple example is when something increases linearly. For example, assuming you have a fixed daily income, and save all of it, the amount of money you have is directly proportional to the number of days worked. No exponential function there, whatsoever.
What else can I help you with?
What non-exponential function is its own derivative?
The only non-exponential function that has this property would be a function that has the constant value of zero.
How do you write 0.567 in exponential form?
You would write it as 5.67x10-1
Which exponential equation is equivalent to the logarithmic equation log 200 equals a?
Log 200=a can be converted to an exponential equation if we know the base of the log. Let's assume it is 10 and you can change the answer accordingly if it is something else. 10^a=200 would be the exponential equation. For a base b, we would have b^a=200
How do you write 144 in exponential form?
12^2
How do you write 64 in exponential form?
The standard form would be 6.4*101 Interpreting the question in a particularly odd way, you could say 26 was a way to write 64 in exponential form.
