These are the rational numbers.
The way you wrote it is the standard notation. Standard notation means to write the number in its standard form. So, a number such as 150 is simply written as 150 in standard notation. The same applies to decimals.
Rational numbers can be expressed in the form p/q (where q is not equal to zero). Irrational numbers cannot be expressed in this form. For example, the square root of 2 cannot be expressed as p/q.
Three million is written in numbers as 3,000,000.
You cannot. There are thought to be fewer than a googol atoms in the known universe so you cannot even write a googol in number form: you can only write such large numbers in exponent form.
No, irrational numbers cannot be written in the form of a/b. 75 can be written as 75/1
They are both real numbers. Rational numbers are numbers that can be written as a fraction. Irrational numbers cannot be expressed as a fraction.
Numbers that cannot be expressed in the form of a ratio of two integers.
Irrational numbers are a subset of real numbers which cannot be written in the form of a ratio of two integers. A consequence is that their decimal representation is non-terminating and non-repeating.
Rational numbers are numbers that can be written as a fraction. Irrational numbers cannot be expressed as a fraction.
5 is rational. Rational numbers are numbers that can be written as a fraction. Irrational Numbers cannot be expressed as a fraction.
Numbers written without exponents are called Standard Form.
They are real numbers that cannot be expressed in the form of a ratio of two integers.
numbers, words, etc.
Rational numbers are numbers that can be written as the division of two integers where the divisor is not zero. Irrational numbers are numbers that are not rational.Irrational numbers, therefore, are numbers that can notbe written as the division of two integers where the divisor is not zero.
4.72 is a rational number because if so required it can be expressed as fraction in the form of 118/25 in its lowest terms.
The ratio of 3 numbers cannot be expressed as a singe fraction.