To do the calculations:
3668 meters = 3.66800 kilometers
And
3.67 kilometers = 3670 meters
So
3.67 kilometers is greater than 3668 meters
3.67 km > 3668 m
20 km are more than 20 m meters because kilometers are bigger than meters so 20 meters are less than 20 kilometers.
That depends on the building, and on which dimension of it you're measuring.If you're measuring the height of the building, then 'meters' probably does it for everycase. The tallest building I know off the top of my head is the Amoco/Aon building inChicago ... the 3rd tallest in the city ... which is 346 meters above the street level,so a building would have to be almost 3 times as tall as that one before 'kilometers'might become a better choice.If you're measuring the length or width of the building, 'meters' is usually the betterchoice. But if you're doing one like the Pentagon, or the US Military Records Centerin St. Louis, then 'kilometers' might produce the more convenient number.
This depends on the area you live in and how much area there is. If you lived in the US, you would more likely measure by hectares, acres, and other units of area. However, if you live in Great Britain, Asia or Australia and other parts of the world, you would more likely use square meters and centimeters. Now to your question. Which unit would you use to measure area: square centimeters or square meters? If I were to draw a square on a piece of paper, it would not match up to a single meter in length so I would measure by square centimeters (GB) or square inches (US). But if I were to measure larger areas such as land, I would measure in square meters (GB) or square feet and hectares (US).
There are 0.001 kilometers in 1 meter. This relationship is more easily expressed and understood in the form of 1000 meters equals 1 kilometer. A kL, or kiloliter, is equal to 1000 liters, and therefore cannot be converted to meters.
Kilometres would be too much while centimetres too small. I suppose you could measure it in feet or yards but I think more people know about metres
Not normally because meters would be more appropriate
Which is more 8001 meters or 8 kilometers?
1 kilometer = 1,000 meters 2 kilometers = 2,000 meters 2,002 meters is more than that.
meters, centimeters, millimeters, kilometers, miles, feet, yard, inches and many more.
Kilometers/hour2. Note that for this kind of calculation, it is much more common to measure distances in meters, time in seconds, velocity in meters/second, and acceleration in meters/second2.
3 kilometers is far more longer than 4 meters. 1 kilometer = 1,000 meters. 3 kilometers would be equal to 3,000 meters.
there are 1000 meters in 1 kilometer...
A kilometer is one thousand meters. So yes, a kilometer is larger.
As square meters are a measure of area, you can measure any area you like in square meters. However: for large areas, eg the area of a piece of land, hectares or square kilometers may be more appropriate; for small areas, eg the area of a piece of paper, square cenitmeters or square millimeters may be more appropriate.
7,996
No, it is not.
There are 3,200 meters in 3.2 kilometers. 3.2 kilometers x 1000 meters/1 kilometer = 3,200 meters 1 kilometer = 1000 meters