Simple answer:
When rounding to the nearest hundred, it is rounding to which of the numbers {0, 100, 200, 300, ...} is closest* to the number.
Is 58 closer to 0 or 100?
It is 58 away from "0" but only 42 away from "100"; 42 is less than 58 so it is closer to "100" and so rounds to 100 to the nearest hundred.
*If a number is exactly halfway between two of the numbers, convention has decided that it rounds up (to the higher number).
More technical answer:
Every place value column can contain the digits 0 to 9 and the place value of the digit is its face value multiplied by the place value column:
Every number is built up by adding together all the digits of the number multiplied by their place values, eg 58 = 50 + 8 = 5 x 10 + 8 x 1.
But what about an empty place value?
Take the digits 5 and 8, written as 58 they mean 58; or do they? What if the 5 was in the hundreds column and the 8 is in the ones column? How do you know the tens column is empty? With old number systems which used multiple symbols to represent numbers, eg the Roman numbers DVIII (= 508) and LVIII (= 58), this was not a problem as all the symbols were added together (DVIII = D + V + I + I + I = 500 + 5 + 1 + 1 = 508). To solve this problem a mark was used to indicate an empty column, which over [a short] time became the zero (0). Now 508 and 58 were as distinguishable as their old versions (Roman: DVIII and LVIII).
Today we interpret a zero in the place value system as zero times the column value which is zero; it adds 0 x place_value = 0 to the number.
But in the number 58 there is an empty hundreds place value column. So it can be marked with a zero: 058. But does writing the zero change the value of the number? 58 = 5 x 10 + 8 x 1, but 058 = 0 x 100 + 5 x 10 + 8 x 1 = 58; so no it does not change the value of the number.
The decision over whether to write a zero in a place value column or not is simple: if the value of a number [can] changes without the zero written it must be written; if it does not change the value, it may be written, but it is usually not written. For example 58.0 is the same as 58, but 508 is NOT the same as 58.
So with 58, the hundreds place value is empty and could be written with a zero (to indicate no hundreds (0 x 100) are present) and so does have a digit in the hundreds place value. Now the "rules" of rounding whereby "if the next digit is 5 or more add one to the place" can be done: The next digit after the hundreds is the tens digit which is 5, which is 5 or more, so 1 is added to the hundreds digit which is zero and so becomes 0 + 1 = 1.
58.0
10.3
8499 should certainly be rounded to 8000, though I would argue that 8500 is the largest number that should be rounded to 8000.
0.2 is the closest that you will get. The nearest integer, though, is 0.
I used a conversion tool so these should be fairly accurate. You may wish to double check though. 1.75 liters equals 3.70 US pints (rounded), 7.30 cups (rounded), 1.85 US quarts (rounded), 0.46 US gallons (rounded), or 59.17 US fluid ounces (rounded).
1 pound = 4.4484 newtons (rounded) 1 newton = 0.2248 pound (rounded) = 3.6 ounces (rounded) I don't know how big your grapefruits are, and tempted though I am, I don't think it's wise to pursue that line of inquiry.
9349 rounded to the nearest hundred is 9300. I have no idea what that has to do with "went you", though.
800
37.4
Yes, it's just like 115 to the nearest hundred is 100. If the last two digits is less than 50 you have to round down. -15 to the nearest hundred is also 0. -95 to the nearest hundred is -100. -115 to the nearest hundred is -100. I'm not sure what -50 to the nearest hundred is, though!
That is rounded to the hundreds place. The 7 is in the tenths place and the 5 is in the hundreds place. If you want to round it to the tenths place though, it would be 0.8 because 5's always round up.
10.3
35.00
175.0
0.375 Im not sure in terms of a fraction though.
well, when you are rounding to tenths, you are rounding the numeral directly to the right of the decimal either up to the next highest numeral, or you are leaving it as is. if the second number after the decimal (the hundredths place) is 5 or higher, you round up. If 4 or lower, you round down. You only check that number, and no others, when rounding up at this level of thinking.so, as a result, 8.38 rounded to the nearest tenth is 8.4if it were 8.345, it would be 8.3 rounded to the nearest tenths even though rounded to the hundredths it would be 8.35 and 8.35 rounded to the tenths is 8.4. however if there is such a version of rounding, which could be possible and has been done by me by mistake in the past, I don't know of it.
649 rounded to the nearest 100 would be 600. Once it reaches 650 though, it would round up to 700.
70.0