The nucleon number is not 35.5! Chlorine has isotopes with 35 or 37 nucleons but a fractional number is not possible.
There is no reason for it to be a whole number!
3.3 is a mixed number and there is no way to represent it as a whole number. The whole part of it is 3.
what is 8.525 rounded to the nearest whole number
well im not that sure but i think it is a whole number and a fraction.
6 I think
The compound of copper and chlorine with the lowest atomic ratio of copper to chlorine is CuCl2.
There is no reason for it to be a whole number!
Each nucleon (proton or neutron) contributes about 1 atomic mass unit to the mass of the atom. The mass contribution of the electrons can be ignored, since it takes about 1800 of them to equal the mass of a nucleon and the heaviest elements known have around 1/15th that number of electrons. So if you subtract the atomic number (number of protons) from the atomic mass rounded to the nearest whole number (number of nucleons), what's left is the number of neutrons.
Yes, 113 is a whole number
3.3 is a mixed number and there is no way to represent it as a whole number. The whole part of it is 3.
The number of protons in an element does not depend on the charge of the element. An atom of a given element has the same number of protons as an isotope of that element. Thus, a calcium ion has 20 protons, just like atoms in calcium metal.
no, i dont think so
18.5 neutrons Neutrons can not be a fraction. Must be a whole number. Chlorine has 18 neutrons
3.49 rounded to the nearest whole number = 33
what is 8.525 rounded to the nearest whole number
yes, I think so
No. If it is an integer then it is a whole number.