Because there is no number of the form x = p/q where p and q are integers such that x-squared = 2.
No. The square root of two is an irrational number. If you multiply the square root of two by the square root of two, you get two which is a rational number.
The square root of 31 is an irrational number and so there are no integers for it.
The square root of 2 times the square root of 2 is rational.
The sum, or difference, of two irrational numbers can be rational, or irrational. For example, if A = square root of 2 and B = square root of 3, both the sum and difference are irrational. If A = (1 + square root of 2), and B = square root of 2, then, while both are irrational, the difference (equal to 1) is rational.
the square root of 2 fifths of irrational is 0.565685425
No. The square root of two is an irrational number. If you multiply the square root of two by the square root of two, you get two which is a rational number.
Yes. For example, the square root of 3 (an irrational number) times the square root of 2(an irrational number) gets you the square root of 6(an irrational number)
The answer to this question confuses me. The square root of two is an irrational number, so obviously if the square root of two is squared it becomes two which is a rational number. Thinking of it that way then the answer is yes, the square of an irrational number can be a rational number. But . . . You had to know beforehand that the irrational number was the square root of another number. If you start out with an irrational number such as Pi you cannot square it because you cannot know the entire number in order to square it.
The square root of 8 is an irrational number because it cannot be represented as a fraction of two integers.
The square root of 11 is irrational. An irrational number is a number that cannot be expressed as a simple fraction or ratio of two integers. In the case of the square root of 11, it is a non-repeating, non-terminating decimal and cannot be simplified further. Therefore, it falls under the category of irrational numbers.
Some square roots of whole numbers are integers, some of them are irrational numbers. The square root of four for instance is a rational number, 2. The square root of two however is an irrational number, approximately 1.414211356.
The square root of 31 is an irrational number and so there are no integers for it.
No. For example, the square root of two plus (minus the square root of two) = 0, which is not an irrational number.
The two square roots are irrational.
The square root of 2 times the square root of 2 is rational.
Usually they are. More specifically, if you take the square root of a positive integer, there are only two possibilities:* If you take the square root of a perfect square, you get a whole number. * In all other cases, you get an irrational number.
The square root of 97 is an irrational number. This is because the square root of 97 cannot be expressed as a fraction of two integers. In other words, the decimal representation of the square root of 97 goes on forever without repeating, making it an irrational number.