Actually it is. Well, it depends what definition of "whole number" you use. Some definitions include only positive integers, some use it as a synonym of "integers". Therefore, due to this ambiguity, the phrase "whole numbers" would better be avoided in math. Rather, use words or phrases like "integers", "positive integers", or "non-negative integers", to convey the exact meaning, without ambiguity.
Oh, dude, 33 percent to the nearest whole number is like 33.3 percent. But if you want it as a whole number, then it's 33 percent. So, like, if you're rounding it to the nearest whole number, it's still 33. Hope that helps!
The whole number part is 0.
a whole number
-5 is not a whole number. it is an integer. whole number starts from 0 to infinity.
0.0625 is a mixed number and there is no way to represent it as a whole number. The whole part of it is 0.
yes, 0 is a whole number
1 8th is not a whole number. The nearest whole number is 0.
A WHOLE NUMBER IS ANY NUMBER FROM 0 TO INFINITY.
No it isnt. The "-2" part is a whole number, but once you start tacking on more fragments and bits after the decimal point, you don't have a whole number any more.
It is not a whole number. The nearest whole number is 0.
Oh, dude, 33 percent to the nearest whole number is like 33.3 percent. But if you want it as a whole number, then it's 33 percent. So, like, if you're rounding it to the nearest whole number, it's still 33. Hope that helps!
0 is whole no but not a natural no.
The nearest whole number is 0.
The nearest whole number is 0.
The whole number part is 0.
No, a whole number does not have to 0
The nearest whole number is 0.