Actually it is. Well, it depends what definition of "whole number" you use. Some definitions include only positive integers, some use it as a synonym of "integers". Therefore, due to this ambiguity, the phrase "whole numbers" would better be avoided in math. Rather, use words or phrases like "integers", "positive integers", or "non-negative integers", to convey the exact meaning, without ambiguity.
The nearest whole number is 0.The nearest whole number is 0.The nearest whole number is 0.The nearest whole number is 0.
To the nearest whole number 0.08 is 0.
To the nearest whole number 0.05 → 0
The whole number part is 0.
a whole number
The nearest whole number is 0.The nearest whole number is 0.The nearest whole number is 0.The nearest whole number is 0.
yes, 0 is a whole number
1 8th is not a whole number. The nearest whole number is 0.
A WHOLE NUMBER IS ANY NUMBER FROM 0 TO INFINITY.
No it isnt. The "-2" part is a whole number, but once you start tacking on more fragments and bits after the decimal point, you don't have a whole number any more.
To the nearest whole number 0.08 is 0.
It is not a whole number. The nearest whole number is 0.
To the nearest whole number 0.05 → 0
0 is whole no but not a natural no.
The nearest whole number is 0.
The nearest whole number is 0.
The whole number part is 0.