because the maths people didn't want it to be. they did the same with 5 and 21. i think its evil too but its not thee fault really, they didn't know you wouldn't like it
sorry i had a random moment when i wrote that
i dint really know why i think it would be cool if it was because then maths would be so much easier
No, 82 is not a multiple of 9 because 9 can not be multiplied by any whole number to get 82. (9x9=81, 9x10=90, there is no 82 in between).
Notice that 63 is a multiple of 9 and 81 (which is close to 82) is a multiple of 9. This gives a decent approximation to 63/82. More specifically, 63/82 is approximately 7/9, or 0.7778.
she isnt dead shes 82
least common multiple of 15 and 82
82 and 9 over 40 as a decimal = 82.225 82 9/40 = 82 + (9 ÷ 40) = 82 + 0.225 = 82.225 l
No, it is not.
The Least Common Multiple (LCM) for 82 94 is 3,854.
Least common multiple of 82 and 42 is 1722.
No.
No
82/9 = 9 and 1/9
The least common multiple of 50 82 and 90 is 18450