Since a toothpaste tube is a rather small object, it would be advisable to measure it in millimeters. Liters being to big of a measurement for it.
You can measure small lengths in millimeters. Length of a pencil, pen, eraser, length and width of a paper, sheet etc. can be measured in millimeters.
millimeters squared
liters
kilograms
Liters!! SCIENCE WOOHOO
mm is a measure of length, liters are a measure of volume, the two can not be equated.
Gallons (standard) or liters (metric).
You would use division or multiplication depending on which way you were converting liters and milliliters. To convert liters to milliliters, you would multiply by 1,000; to convert milliliters to liters, you would divide.
If you have three measurements of length (meters, centimeters, millimeters) and you multiply them together, you will end up with a measure of volume (liters). Of course, if you were to actually do this, you would want to convert all of the lengths into a common unit (convert centimeters and millimeters to meters or convert meters and centimeters to millimeters).
Millimeters
You would measure the distance of the door with meters because liters measure volume not length.
No you would measure it in kilos, because its mass and volume are too great to measure in liters alone.
1.6 centimeters = 16 millimeters
If you convert 500 cc to liters, the result is 0.5 liters. It would take 1000 cubic centimeters to equal a liter.
1000 * * * * * No! A litre is a measure of volume, whereas millimetre is a measure of length. The two measure different things and, according to the basic principles of dimensional analysis, conversion from one to the other is not valid.
I would use millimeter.......Because a butterfly is so small and we can measure it's wings by using millimeters.
Liters is the most appropriate measure.