answersLogoWhite

0

To demonstrate the validity of a statement using proof by absurdity or contradiction, we assume the opposite of the statement is true and then show that this assumption leads to a logical contradiction or absurdity. This contradiction proves that the original statement must be true.

User Avatar

AnswerBot

2mo ago

What else can I help you with?

Continue Learning about Philosophy

State the principle of contradiction in critical thinking?

The principle of contradiction states that two contradictory statements cannot both be true at the same time. It is a fundamental law of logic that helps to identify and resolve logical inconsistencies or fallacies in arguments. Adhering to this principle is essential in maintaining logical coherence and validity in critical thinking.


What is a categorical error and how does it impact the validity of a statement or argument?

A categorical error occurs when the terms or categories used in a statement or argument are not logically related or do not align properly. This impacts the validity of the statement or argument because it introduces a flaw in the reasoning, making it less reliable or convincing.


How can a statement be self-refuting?

A statement is self-refuting when it contradicts itself or undermines its own validity, making it logically impossible to be true.


How can language proof and logic hints be used to demonstrate the validity of a mathematical theorem?

Language, proof, and logic hints can be used to show the validity of a mathematical theorem by carefully constructing a clear and logical argument that follows the rules of mathematical reasoning. By using precise language to define terms, presenting a step-by-step proof that logically connects each statement to the next, and ensuring that the reasoning is sound and free from errors, one can demonstrate that the theorem is true based on established mathematical principles.


How is contradiction different from an argument?

A contradiction occurs when two statements cannot both be true at the same time, leading to inconsistency. An argument, on the other hand, involves presenting a claim supported by reasons and evidence to persuade others of its validity or truth. In an argument, the aim is to provide a coherent and logical explanation, while a contradiction highlights an inconsistency or conflict in statements.

Related Questions

What is a validity statement?

A validity statement for a bibliography talks about the reliability and reputability of the source. More reliable sources will be textbooks, .edu and .gov wbesites and will be consistent with information from other sources.


Define validity generalization Explain how validity is determined and list three types of validity?

Validity generalization is a statistical approach used to demonstrate that test validities do not vary across situations


State the principle of contradiction in critical thinking?

The principle of contradiction states that two contradictory statements cannot both be true at the same time. It is a fundamental law of logic that helps to identify and resolve logical inconsistencies or fallacies in arguments. Adhering to this principle is essential in maintaining logical coherence and validity in critical thinking.


What is regis philbin net worth?

Dave Letterman says 50 billion ...prompting me to check the validity of the statement.


What are correct proofs?

Correct proofs are logical arguments that demonstrate the validity or truth of a mathematical statement. They typically follow a clear and structured format, starting with a hypothesis, presenting a series of logical steps, and ending with a conclusion that definitively proves the statement. A correct proof should be concise, easy to follow, and free of errors in reasoning.


What is a categorical error and how does it impact the validity of a statement or argument?

A categorical error occurs when the terms or categories used in a statement or argument are not logically related or do not align properly. This impacts the validity of the statement or argument because it introduces a flaw in the reasoning, making it less reliable or convincing.


What does the word validity refer to?

The term validity is the action of validating something. When something is valid, it is real, legitimate, or a true true statement about a topic or subject.


How can a statement be self-refuting?

A statement is self-refuting when it contradicts itself or undermines its own validity, making it logically impossible to be true.


How can language proof and logic hints be used to demonstrate the validity of a mathematical theorem?

Language, proof, and logic hints can be used to show the validity of a mathematical theorem by carefully constructing a clear and logical argument that follows the rules of mathematical reasoning. By using precise language to define terms, presenting a step-by-step proof that logically connects each statement to the next, and ensuring that the reasoning is sound and free from errors, one can demonstrate that the theorem is true based on established mathematical principles.


How is contradiction different from an argument?

A contradiction occurs when two statements cannot both be true at the same time, leading to inconsistency. An argument, on the other hand, involves presenting a claim supported by reasons and evidence to persuade others of its validity or truth. In an argument, the aim is to provide a coherent and logical explanation, while a contradiction highlights an inconsistency or conflict in statements.


What is Systematic presentation of reasoning and supporting evidence that proves the validity of a statement or position?

Argument


Example of validity?

In general terms, "validity" denotes "something acceptable within context". Thus, in an ordinary, everyday context, an example of "validity" would be a statement made which turns out to be true. Here, one would say that the statement made has "validity". By contrast, in a legal context, a statement made by a witness in a court case might be considered to lack "validity" because of certain legal strictures that prevent the witness' perspective from being considered by a jury. Many other examples could be provided, given the many different applications of "validity" that are possible.