The trolley problem can be applied to real-life ethical dilemmas by considering situations where a difficult choice must be made to save some people at the expense of others. By analyzing the consequences of different actions and weighing the ethical principles involved, individuals can navigate complex moral decisions in various scenarios.
Chat with our AI personalities
Relativism and absolutism are two contrasting approaches to ethical decision-making. Relativism suggests that ethical principles are subjective and vary depending on the context or culture, while absolutism holds that certain ethical principles are universal and apply in all situations. These two perspectives often conflict in ethical dilemmas, with relativism emphasizing flexibility and context, and absolutism emphasizing consistency and universal principles.
The best approach to the study of business ethics involves understanding foundational ethical theories, analyzing case studies to apply these theories, discussing ethical dilemmas with peers, and staying updated on current ethical issues in the business world. It is also important to reflect on personal values and ethics to make informed and ethical decisions in business contexts.
Ethical code or code of conduct.
Kant considered ethical principles to be similar to universal laws that apply to all rational beings. He believed that these principles should be based on reason rather than subjective feelings or desires. In this way, ethical principles can be applied universally and must be followed without exception.
Absolutism believes in universal moral principles that apply to all situations, while relativism holds that ethical decisions depend on the context and cultural norms. Absolutism emphasizes objective truths, while relativism emphasizes subjective perspectives.