Wiki User
β 9y agoThe initial velocity is sqrt(5) times the vertical component, and its angle relative to the horizontal direction, is 0.46 radians (26.6 degrees).
Wiki User
β 9y agoThe initial magnitude of the velocity is sqrt(5) times the horizontal component. This results in a velocity vector that is inclined at an angle of arctan(2) β 63.43 degrees with respect to the horizontal.
To have equilibrium, the net force acting on the particle must be zero. The magnitude of force F must be equal in magnitude (but opposite in direction) to the resultant of all other forces acting on the particle. Therefore, to determine F, you need to calculate the vector sum of all other forces acting on the particle and then determine the magnitude and direction for F.
If the acceleration of a particle is constant in magnitude but not in direction, the particle will follow a curved path. The changing direction of the acceleration will cause the particle to continually change its velocity vector, resulting in curved motion.
No. Velocity implies both a magnitude and a direction.No. Velocity implies both a magnitude and a direction.No. Velocity implies both a magnitude and a direction.No. Velocity implies both a magnitude and a direction.
The translational speed of a particle at a point is the magnitude of the particle's velocity vector at that point. It is given by the derivative of the position vector with respect to time evaluated at that point.
Another factor that determines the magnitude of the electric potential is the amount of charge on the particle creating the electric field. The electric potential is directly proportional to the charge creating the field.
If the charge of the particle is such that it is attracted to the E-field then it's motion is analogous to gravitational free fall in a couple of ways. - Both forces have no horizontal component, therefore no horizontal acceleration. - Both forces interact at a magnitude inversely proportional to the square of their distance. - In both cases, Newton's third law applies, despite the nearly unmeasurable effects that the particle/body has on the field/earth.
At the highest point of the particle's trajectory, its kinetic energy will be zero because it momentarily comes to a stop at that point. Potential energy will be at a maximum at this point.
The kinetic energy of a particle projected vertically upwards can be calculated using the formula: KE = 1/2 * m * v^2, where m is the mass of the particle and v is the velocity at which it is projected upwards. The kinetic energy is the energy associated with the motion of the particle.
To have equilibrium, the net force acting on the particle must be zero. The magnitude of force F must be equal in magnitude (but opposite in direction) to the resultant of all other forces acting on the particle. Therefore, to determine F, you need to calculate the vector sum of all other forces acting on the particle and then determine the magnitude and direction for F.
The magnitude of the vibration of its molecules gets increased.
If the acceleration of a particle is constant in magnitude but not in direction, the particle will follow a curved path. The changing direction of the acceleration will cause the particle to continually change its velocity vector, resulting in curved motion.
I am assuming that this is to do with the trajectory that is simplified to that of a particle which does not incur air resistance. If I have understood the question correctly, the particle travels under the influence of a constant force - assumed to be gravity which acts downwards. The model can be extended to allow for a constant force acting at an angle but the calculations then become more complicated. The particle is projected upwards, with the initial velocity, u ms-1, which makes an angle P with the horizontal. u is a variable such that the horizontal range of the particle is a constant. The vertical component of the initial velocity is u*sin(P) ms-1. The gravitational force, acting downwards, is -g ms-2. When the particle returns to the ground level, the vertical component of its velocity is -u*sin(P) ms-1. So if the particle returns at time t seconds, then t = [u*sin(P) - -u*sin(P)] /g = 2*u*sin(P)/g sec. The horizontal component of the velocity of the particle is a constant u*cos(P) ms-1. So during the time in flight, it travels u*cos(P)*2*u*sin(P)/g m = 2*u2*sin(P)*cos(P)/g m. This horizontal distance is constant, which implies that 2*u2*sin(P)*cos(P)/g is constant so that u2 is inversely proportional to sin(P)*cos(P). So let u = sqrt[k/sin(P)*cos(P)] ms-1 for some constant k. then its vertical component is u*sin(P) = sqrt[k/sin(P)*cos(P)]*sin(P) ms-1 = sqrt[k*tan(P)] Then at time T, its height is sqrt[k*tan(P)]*T - 0.5g*T2 I just hope this is correct!
No. Velocity implies both a magnitude and a direction.No. Velocity implies both a magnitude and a direction.No. Velocity implies both a magnitude and a direction.No. Velocity implies both a magnitude and a direction.
If you were to graph particle size and porosity, it would be a constant slope (horizontal line).Porosity is not affected by particle size.
The translational speed of a particle at a point is the magnitude of the particle's velocity vector at that point. It is given by the derivative of the position vector with respect to time evaluated at that point.
You are mad 😂😂 you don't know this much easy answer 😆😆
Another factor that determines the magnitude of the electric potential is the amount of charge on the particle creating the electric field. The electric potential is directly proportional to the charge creating the field.