Old answer: the scientists found them in the 2 regions and
Mesosaurus was significant in providing evidence for the theory of continental drift, because its remains were found in southern Africa and eastern South America, two far away places. As Mesosaurus was a small freshwater organism, and therefore could not have crossed the Atlantic Ocean, this distribution indicated that Africa and South America used to be joined together. Indeed, all the world's continents were joined into one supercontinent called Pangaea in the time Mesosaurus existed.
The theory of plate tectonics easily explains the distribution of mesosaurus. When mesosaurus was alive, all of the continents were massed together into the supercontinent Pangaea. Therefor, South America and Africa met because there was no Atlantic Ocean, so the distribution of mesosaurus makes complete sense.
The fossil that was found on different continents and used to support the theory of continental drift is the Mesosaurus. This extinct freshwater reptile had limited swimming abilities, making it unlikely that it could have crossed vast oceans. Its distribution on both sides of the Atlantic Ocean provided evidence of land connections that later formed the basis for the theory of continental drift.
He had evidence from Climate- because fossils of plants forming in places without the ideal temperature were found and the same plants found at another place with the right temperature. Fossils- fossils of the reptiles mesosaurus and lystrosaurus found on continents separated by ocean and neither could swim that great of a distance in salt water, and Land Features- Mountain ranges in south America match up with the mountain ranges in Africa, like a jigsaw- puzzle Hope this helps :)
Since the Mesosaurus was a fresh water reptile, there was no way it could've swam across the Atlantic Ocean (which has salt water) to both continents. So that meant Africa and South America were at one point joined together.
As the sample size increases, and the number of samples taken increases, the distribution of the means will tend to a normal distribution. This is the Central Limit Theorem (CLT). Try out the applet and you will have a better understanding of the CLT.
The theory of continental drift explains how kangaroo fossils could have been found in Africa, as it suggests that continents were once connected as a single landmass called Pangaea. Over time, the continents drifted apart to their current positions, carrying fossils with them. This helps to explain how species like kangaroos, which are native to Australia, could have ended up in Africa in the past.
Crocodiles could be considered to be "living fossils" as they have survived on Earth from the time of the dinosaurs.
The basic principle of both theories is same that is distribution of electrons but mot is superior to vbt. The reason is that vbt could not explain paramagnetic character of oxygen while the mot has sucessfully explain the paramagnetic character of oxygen.
if you have dimond you have to use explorer kit
One drawback of JJ Thomson's atomic model was that it could not explain the distribution of positive charge within the atom. Additionally, it could not account for the stability of atoms with multiple electrons. Ultimately, Thomson's model was replaced by the more accurate and comprehensive model proposed by Ernest Rutherford.
No because it's not a body built for it and it's a freshwater animal.
Evidence from land features fossils and ancient climate zones or changes. Many continents are neatly lined up with each other for example Africa's coast lines up with south America's east coast and north American coal beds line up with European coal beds. Many fossils of animals are found on continents that are now separated neither animal could swim that far.The animals are called Mesosaurus and Mesosaurus.Plant fossils are found in Antarctica and are tropical plants which means Antarctica was near the equator at one time. Hope this helped!!!!!!!!!!!!