Definitely not. When that test was made up, 100 was supposed to mean exactly average for your age.
A lot of people have a lot of doubts and questions about the whole idea of IQ testing, so it's definitely
not something you should spend a lot of time worrying about. But if it did work exactly the way it was
supposed to work, then 103 at any age would mean that about 49% of the people of your same age
have a higher IQ than you, and about 51% of them have a lower IQ.
Maybe the test means something and maybe it doesn't. But there's one thing I can definitely promise you:
A lot of very rich, very important, very successful, and very famous people have IQs that are lower than 103 !
A score of 103 on an IQ test for an 11-year-old is considered to be average. IQ scores are standardized based on age, so a score close to 100 is typical for most individuals. It's important to remember that IQ scores are just one measure of cognitive ability and do not reflect a person's worth or potential.
Around 8-9 years old.
Lucian Freud was born on December 8, 1922, and passed away on July 20, 2011, making him 88 years old at the time of his death.
An IQ score of 108 is considered average, falling within the range of 85-115. It is neither particularly good nor bad, but rather represents a typical level of cognitive ability for a 31 year old male. IQ scores are just one measure of intelligence and don't provide a complete picture of an individual's abilities.
The Kaufman Adolescent and Adult Intelligence Test (KAIT) is an intelligence test designed to assess intellectual functioning in individuals aged 11 to 85 years old. It measures verbal and nonverbal cognitive abilities across a wide range of areas, such as fluid reasoning, knowledge, quantitative reasoning, visual-spatial processing, and working memory. The KAIT is useful for identifying cognitive strengths and weaknesses, diagnosing learning disabilities, and informing educational and intervention planning.
Yes there are separate IQ tests for different age groups. Very young children will be given a different I.Q. test than a child of school age, the younger the child the less reliable the I.Q. test. Once entering adulthood (16+) another test will be used. The scores one gets on a test are not directly comparable to people of a different age, for example: If a 16 year old got an I.Q. test score of 110, and a 25 year old also scored 110, this does not mean they scored equally on the test. If the 25 year old were to have answered all questions exactly as the 16 year old did, they would have gotten a much lower score than the 16 year old. This is because, even in the same test, people are compared to others of the same age group, not all takers of the test. The mostly commonly used tests for school aged children is the WISC (Wechsler Intelligence scale for children) and for adults it is the WAIS (Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale).
No it is not a bad score. It is perfectly normal and average.
NO BUT ITS NOT BAD EITHER.
A little over 2 years - 365 + 365 = 730 and 833 - 730 = 103. The answer is 2 years 103 days.
103 is slightly above average by 3 points so the answer is yes:-) :-)
As a distinct denomination, from 1906, which means 103 years in 2009.
40-50 years old depending on the enviroment, but their has been a record of up to 103 years old.
It was built in 1907 so 103 years old.
The Plaza Hotels construction was finished in 1907. Which makes it 103 years old.
Sicco Mansholt is 103 years old (birthdate: September 13, 1908).
Dorothy Young is 103 years old (birthdate: May 3, 1907).
There are approximately 100,000 people in the U.S. who are over 100 years old (from Wikipedia)
Nguyen Ngoc Tho is 103 years old (birthdate: May 26, 1908).