First, IQ tests are designed so that your score takes your age into account. This means that (ideally) a person exactly as smart as you, but older or younger than you should get the exact same score. (So if a person exactly as smart as you, but 30 years old took an IQ test, they should also get 107).
Now for the main part of your question. A score of 106 is less than one standard deviation above the norm (average). This means you scored higher than approximately 60% of people. So, for every hundred people you meet, on average, you are smarter than 60 of them and 39 are smarter than you.
You should be careful though if you took the test off a website or some other place online it is most likely not accurate. The only way to get a real IQ test that is reliable and valid (meaning, it measures your intelligence accurately) is to get professionally tested through a mental health professional using a carefully researched and designed measure. For someone your age the most likely test they would use is the Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children (WISC-R) which is used to test intelligence in children aged 6 to 16.
And remember, IQ is just a measure of one kind of intelligence, and your results can be affected by things such as ADHD or learning disabilities.
An IQ score of 141 for a 6 year old is considered very high and falls into the "gifted" range. It indicates exceptional cognitive abilities and potential for advanced learning. It's recommended to provide appropriate educational and enrichment opportunities to support the child's intellectual development.
A score of 108 is considered to fall within the average range for IQ tests. It indicates that the 8-year-old boy's cognitive abilities are on par with his peers. IQ scores are just one measure of intelligence and may not fully capture a child's abilities or potential.
From what I remember learning at school... IQ follows the natural curve. That means given the average score and the standard deviation we can begin to define what a good score is. The average for IQ tests, by design is 100. So, right off the bat we see that every score is above average, and therefore they are all good scores, relative to the mean. It doesn't matter what age you are, your score can be compared to anyone's. We also know the standard deviation for IQ scores is 15, so we can begin to quantify how good the scores are if we know how standard deviation works. We know that 50% of the people will score below 100. If we move one standard deviation better than the mean we get 115. That's better than 84% of people. 90% of people will score under 130 (two standard deviations better than average). 99.4% of people will score under 145 (three standard deviations). 99.99% score under 160 (four s.d) 99.99997% score under 175 (five s.d.) (about 1 in 3 million score higher) 99.9999999% score under 190 (six s.d) (about 1 in 1 billion score higher) Finally, 99.9999999999% score under 205 (seven s.d.) (about 1 in 1 trillion score higher (an impossible score)). I know the percentages because that is just how standard deviations work. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Standard_deviation Your question is inappropriate as all IQ tests are "normed". Any score will be relative to other children or adults of the same age. These tests are intentionally tested on children of different ages to discover what a "normal" child of a given age will score. The IQ score is how the individual did in relation to that normalized score. Anything over 100 is better than that age normed score and anything below 100 is below that normalized score.
An IQ score of 97 for an 8-year-old falls within the average range. This means the 8-year-old girl is performing at a level similar to her peers in terms of intellectual ability. Keep in mind that IQ scores are just one measure of cognitive functioning and should be interpreted in conjunction with other factors.
That is completely up to you. I am a 13 year-old girl and I have an IQ of 137. Therefore, you decide for yourself if you think that is a good score or not.
No.
No, the average IQ score, regardless of age is from 90 to 109.
That depends on the result of the child's IQ test.
No. It is above the average of 100 so it cannot be considered bad.
I believe its a little above average. Which isn't bad.
Yes. It dimply frustrates you and scares your child.
Yes it is bad and illegal. At 11 years old you are still a minor child and below the age of consent in any state. The "boyfriend" is 18 and an adult and is committing child sexual abuse dating a 11 year old. He can be charged with rape and sent to prison.
That just depends on the child if he is like tiger woods when he was little he be hitting birdies.
That is very underweight, take the child to the doctor to see if the child has an illness. A very tiny, scrawny 10 year old would be about 70 pounds.
yep
14 year olds act out. deal with it.
Yes, an 11 year old is a child.