0
Before scientists had the correct tools to look inside elements what did they use to draw conclusions about the structure of matter?
Wiki User
∙ 10y ago
What tools did scientists use to look in to elements before they had the right kind of tools
Wiki User
∙ 10y ago
Aisha Ibrahim
Lute Paulsen
Anonymous
id
Add your answer:
Earn +20 pts
What is the series of steps followed to solve problems including collecting data formulating a hypothesis testing the hypothesis and stating conclusions?
Scientific Methods is the correct answer.
What is the correct structure of 3-3-dimethylhexane?
H3c h3c ch3 ch3
What do you call a pyramid with a square at the bottom?
A pyramid is a structure with a square at the bottom and 4 triangles connecting them. You have the correct word.
Why structure expressions in different ways?
The structuring of expressions is to arrive at the correct answer. Using the 'Order of Precedence' : 1. Brackets; 2. Powers and Roots; 3. Multiplication and Division; 4. Addition and Subtraction, ensures that the correct answer is arrived at.
How much cilciuos is equal to 300 Calvin?
You need to do some serious work on your spelling if you want someone to understand your questions! It took a while to figure out what you wanted to know. The correct spellings are Celsius and Kelvin. They are both names of eminent scientists.300 Kelvin = 26.85 degrees Celsius.You need to do some serious work on your spelling if you want someone to understand your questions! It took a while to figure out what you wanted to know. The correct spellings are Celsius and Kelvin. They are both names of eminent scientists.300 Kelvin = 26.85 degrees Celsius.You need to do some serious work on your spelling if you want someone to understand your questions! It took a while to figure out what you wanted to know. The correct spellings are Celsius and Kelvin. They are both names of eminent scientists.300 Kelvin = 26.85 degrees Celsius.You need to do some serious work on your spelling if you want someone to understand your questions! It took a while to figure out what you wanted to know. The correct spellings are Celsius and Kelvin. They are both names of eminent scientists.300 Kelvin = 26.85 degrees Celsius.
What did scientists use to draw conclusions about the structure of matter before the use of correct tools?
Hypothisis
What do scientists draw after analyzing data from experiment?
After analyzing data from their experiments, scientists will draw conclusions. They will consider whether their hypothesis was correct and what the observable trends were in the data.
How did scientists discovering protons and neutrons help them to place elements in their correct order and group?
By discovering the elements proton number, it became easier for scientists because the elements had similar properties. And they could arrange it by increasing proton number, valence electrons or electronic configuration.
How do scientists know that the correct Lewis structure for an oxygen molecule is not as predicted?
They run experiments that can determine the bond strength of a molecule.
Jumping to confusions?
The correct phrase would be, "Jumping to Conclusions"
How many elements are in the periodic table as of 2012?
okay, so people commonly ask about the periodic table. The truth is scientists fought over this, so this answer may vary but, honestly there are 115-118 elements if you put any of those numbers you are correct.
Is scientists spelled correct this way?
It sure is.
How can you check and correct your Lewis structure?
Although Excel checks that the formula has the correct structure, it does not check that the formula contains the correct values or cell references.
Are scientists always correct?
no they are not they are just a bunch of theorys
How is science different from not science?
Science uses painstaking and precise research. Science strives to discover absolute truths. This is what the scientific method is designed to do. Using these strict controls, scientists can draw wrong conclusions, but the system is designed to minimize this problem. No such controls are in place for unscientific approaches. The characteristic flaw in these approaches is the skipping of steps. Verification and peer review are the steps most often neglected. Unscientific approaches can lead to correct conclusions but, most frequently, lead to wrong or misleading conclusions. Credibility is the issue.
Is the correct structure disappointed by or with?
Disappointed with is correct, but I am not sure about disappointes by. sorry
What is the correct order for the scientific method Asking a question performing an experiment gathering observations and coming to conclusions?
yes that is the correct answer
