Those lists are both infinite. If you could specify a range, it would be easier.
The proof that there is no largest prime:Assume that there are a finite number of primes for the sake of contradiction. Then, there should be a number P that equals p1p2p3...pn+1. P is either prime or not prime (composite). If it is prime, we just show that P is larger than the largest prime in the list. If it's not prime, it must be composite. Composite always has at least one factor that is prime, but since P is not divisible by any prime in the list, the unknown prime factor(s) must be something not in the list, this also shows that there is a prime larger than the largest prime in the list. Both cases show that no matter how large a list of prime numbers, there will be always at least one larger prime outside of that list.
Showing a composite number as a product of prime numbers is called prime factorization.
67 is a prime number.
A prime number has only 2 factors which are 1 and itself. Composite numbers are everything else except 1 and 0. 1 and 0 are neither prime, nor composite.
Yes
It is a composite number because it has at least one positive factor other than one or itself.
43 is a prime number whose only factors are itself and one
It's even. The only even prime number is 2.
That's an infinite list.
That's an infinite list.
6 can be divided by 1, 2, 3 . hence, it is not a prime number, so a composite number.
3 13 27 67