"it depends on your pace, but it is only 100 meters short of a mile. So, add somewhere from 20 to 30 seconds."
Adding 20 to 30 seconds doesn't take a runner's pace into consideration. When converting for qualifying standards, I use the following formula...
1500 Meter time in seconds X 1.079709247 =
converted mile time.
For instance, a 4:00.00 1500 meter time would be converted by doing this...
convert 4:00 to seconds. This would give you 240.00 seconds...
Then
240.00 x 1.079709247 =
259.13... This is a 4:19.13 Mile
(the exact conversion of 1500 meters to 1609.343998 meters would use 1.072895999, but we assume that you slow a bit the longer your run.)
Using 1.0797 or about 1.08 allows for some slowing but it may not be enough. An interesting way to look at it is to compare the world records for both races. Interestingly at the current time the world record for both events (for men) is held by Hicham
El Guerrouj
who set the 1500 m. record in July 1998 in Rome at 3:26.0 and the following summer (July 1999) set the 1 mile record of 3:43.1 at the same stadium. The ratio is 1.083, only slightly greater than the 1.0797 suggested above. But the relative slowing over the extra 100 meters may be greater the slower one is running. Also the mile run is not run so frequently as the 1500 meter run so the 1500 meter record should advance more rapidly and make the comparison less valid. Some evidence for the greater relative slowing over the extra 100 meters at a slower pace is that the ratio for the women's world records in the two events is 1.096. But in that case it is 2 different women a few years apart at different tracks so hardly definitive. Using 1.08 to 1.10 seems a reasonable range for a conversion factor for elite to very
fast middle distance runners.
There are roughly 1600 meters in a miles, so your 1500 meter time multiplied by 1600/1500, or 16/15, would give you a mile time. For example, a 6:00 1500 time would be a 6:24 mile.
A mile is more than 1,600 times longer than a meter.
1 mile = 1608 meters, so they are pretty much the same
0.05 of what ? 0.05 mile goes into 1 mile 20 times. 0.05 foot goes in 105,600 times. 0.05 inch goes in 1,267,200 times. 0.05 meter goes in 32,186.9 times. (rounded)
1 m = 0.000621 mi.A meter is many times smaller than a mile. So, one meter equates to only 0.000621 miles.
There are roughly 1600 meters in a miles, so your 1500 meter time multiplied by 1600/1500, or 16/15, would give you a mile time. For example, a 6:00 1500 time would be a 6:24 mile.
0.93 mile 1 mile = 1609.344 meters 1 meter = 0.00062 mile
1 mile equal 1609,344 m. The conversion is only approximated because the man is not only an instrument and the relation is not absolute linear: time for 1500 m = 1500 X time for 1 mile/1609,344
A mile is 7.2% longer than 1500m
A mile is more than 1,600 times longer than a meter.
Likely that you meant 1500 meters, or almost 1 mile. National class HS girls mile times are under 5 minutes, which equates to a 4:38 1500 m time. A 'good' mile time would be under 6 minutes, which equates to a 5:33 1500 m time.
No, 150 meters is not equal to a mile. 1 mile is approximately 1609.34 meters.
Yes, a mile is longer than a meter. One mile is equivalent to 1,609.34 meters.
409,1600 metres = 254.24 miles, approx.
You don't. One is a unit of distance, the other of speed - you can't convert that.
A mile. A mile has 5280 feet while 1600 meters has 5249.3438 feet. A difference of 30.6562 feet.
(1 mile/sec) x (3,600 sec/hour) x (1,609.344 meter/mile) = 5,793,638 meter/hour