0
Let (B, ≤) be a partially ordered set and let C ⊂ B. An upper bound for C is an element b Є Bsuch that c ≤ b for each c Є C. If m is an upper bound for C, and if m ≤ b for each upper bound b of C, then m is a least upper bound of C. C can only have one least upper bound, and it may not have any at all (depending on B). The least upper bound of a set C is often written as lub C.
See related links for more information.
heyy
Add your answer:
Earn +20 pts
How do you define an upper bound of a subset?
Let B, ≤ be a partially ordered set and let C⊂ B with c Є C. Then the element bЄ B is an upper bound for C if c ≤ bfor each c Є C.See related links for more information.
What is the diameter of a subset?
The diameter of the subset C of the metric space B, D is the least upper bound of {D(x, y) | x, y Є C} and is often written as d(C).See related links for more information.
What is LUB in science?
The acronym LUB stands for Least Upper Bound.
Properties of real number?
Real numbers have the two basic properties of being an ordered field, and having the least upper bound property. The first says that real numbers comprise a field, with addition and multiplication as well as division by nonzero numbers, which can be totally ordered on a number line in a way compatible with addition and multiplication. The second says that if a nonempty set of real numbers has an upper bound, then it has a least upper bound. These two together define the real numbers completely, and allow its other properties to be deduced.
How do you find least upper bound and greatest lower bound (if it exists) of (0)?
The answer depends on the level of accuracy of the value 0.
What is upper bound in spss?
In SPSS, an upper bound typically refers to the maximum limit or cutoff point for a value or variable. It is used to define the highest permissible value in a range to prevent extreme values from skewing the data analysis results. Setting an upper bound can help to ensure data integrity and accuracy in statistical analysis.
17.7 to 1dp lower and upper bound?
Lower bound is 17.6 and upper bound is 17.8
What is an example of a function that is continuous and bounded on the interval a b but does not attain its upper bound?
A function whose upper bound would have attained its upper limit at a bound. For example, f(x) = x - a whose domain is a < x < b The upper bound is upper bound is b - a but, because x < b, the bound is never actually attained.
What are two continuous lattices that forms?
Two examples of continuous lattices are the lattice of real numbers with the usual order, and the lattice of open sets of a topological space ordered by inclusion. Both of these lattices satisfy the property that any subset with a lower bound has an infimum and any subset with an upper bound has a supremum in the lattice.
What are the lower bound estimate and the upper bound estimate found by rounding to the greatest place 937 and ndash 156 A. lower bound 700 upper bound 800 B. lower bound 700 upper bound 900 C. lower?
The answer is B.
If A is a set containing all rational numbers that are less than 5 Is there a rational number q in set A such that all other numbers in set A are less than q?
Answer: NO Explanation: Let's look at an example to see how this works. A is all rational numbers less than 5. So one element of A might be 1 since that is less than 5 or 1/2, or -1/2, or even 0. Now if we pick 1/2 or 0, clearly that numbers that are greater than them in the set. So what we are really asking, is there a largest rational number less than 5. In a set A, we define the define the supremum to be the smallest real number that is greater than or equal to every number in A. So do rationals have a supremum? That is really the heart of the question. Now that you understand that, let's state an important finding in math: If an ordered set A has the property that every nonempty subset of A having an upper bound also has a least upper bound, then A is said to have the least-upper-bound property In this case if we pick any number very close to 5, we can find another number even closer because the rational numbers are dense in the real numbers. So the conclusion is that the rational number DO NOT have the least upper bound property. This means there is no number q that fulfills your criteria.
What is the upper bound estimate?
An upper bound estimate is a estimate that is greater than the actual solution.
