answersLogoWhite

0

The second "equation" is, in fact, two equations, and the three equations are inconsistent.

The "second" equation gives :

2x = 3 so that x = 3/2 and also y = 3

But substituting these values in the first equation implies that 3 = (3/2) - 3

or 3 = 3/2 or 2 = 1 which is a contradiction.

The second "equation" is, in fact, two equations, and the three equations are inconsistent.

The "second" equation gives :

2x = 3 so that x = 3/2 and also y = 3

But substituting these values in the first equation implies that 3 = (3/2) - 3

or 3 = 3/2 or 2 = 1 which is a contradiction.

The second "equation" is, in fact, two equations, and the three equations are inconsistent.

The "second" equation gives :

2x = 3 so that x = 3/2 and also y = 3

But substituting these values in the first equation implies that 3 = (3/2) - 3

or 3 = 3/2 or 2 = 1 which is a contradiction.

The second "equation" is, in fact, two equations, and the three equations are inconsistent.

The "second" equation gives :

2x = 3 so that x = 3/2 and also y = 3

But substituting these values in the first equation implies that 3 = (3/2) - 3

or 3 = 3/2 or 2 = 1 which is a contradiction.

User Avatar

Wiki User

12y ago

Still curious? Ask our experts.

Chat with our AI personalities

LaoLao
The path is yours to walk; I am only here to hold up a mirror.
Chat with Lao
TaigaTaiga
Every great hero faces trials, and you—yes, YOU—are no exception!
Chat with Taiga
ReneRene
Change my mind. I dare you.
Chat with Rene
More answers

The second "equation" is, in fact, two equations, and the three equations are inconsistent.

The "second" equation gives :

2x = 3 so that x = 3/2 and also y = 3

But substituting these values in the first equation implies that 3 = (3/2) - 3

or 3 = 3/2 or 2 = 1 which is a contradiction.

User Avatar

Wiki User

12y ago
User Avatar

Add your answer:

Earn +20 pts
Q: How do you solve y equals x-3 and 2x equals y equals 3?
Write your answer...
Submit
Still have questions?
magnify glass
imp