They are not - mainly because there is no such thing as a rectangular. "Rectangular" is an adjective, not a noun and therefore a rectangular, by itself, cannot exist.
They are not - mainly because there is no such thing as a rectangular. "Rectangular" is an adjective, not a noun and therefore a rectangular, by itself, cannot exist.
They are not - mainly because there is no such thing as a rectangular. "Rectangular" is an adjective, not a noun and therefore a rectangular, by itself, cannot exist.
They are not - mainly because there is no such thing as a rectangular. "Rectangular" is an adjective, not a noun and therefore a rectangular, by itself, cannot exist.
A cube is a rectangular prism in which each edge is of the same length.
They are alike, because they both have square bottoms. They are different, because the rectangular prism is longer.
They are all, technically, prisms.
These shapes are alike because they have the same faces, edges,and vertices.
They have the same number of edges, faces and vertices.
a cube is a 3d pop out type of figure,and a retangluar prism is wider and more retangle than a cube. A cube and a square are alike because they are the same shape but they are different size angles and shaps on there verices.
They are both hexahedra with three pairs of parallel faces meeting, three at a time, at right angles. All edges (sides) of a cube are of equal length whereas in a rectangular prism they are not.
They are both hexahedra with three pairs of parallel faces meeting, three at a time, at right angles. All edges (sides) of a cube are of equal length whereas in a rectangular prism they are not.
No, a cube is a cube and a rectangular prism is a rectangular prism. They are two different shapes.
A Rubik's cube is a cube, therefore it is a type of rectangular prism.
they are the same shape, so they will be alike.
A cube is a special case of a rectangular prism. If each edge of a rectangular prism were of the same measure, then it would be a cube.