0
I am not sure whether the term "incommensurable" is appropriate here; the official term is "irrational", which means it can't be expressed exactly as a ratio: you can't write a fraction with integer numerator and denominator which is exactlyequal to the square root of 5 (or of any other integer that is not a perfect square) - but you can obviously get very close to the exact value with such a fraction. If you write the square root of 5 as a decimal, you will get an infinite amount of decimal digits, which will not repeat.
I am not sure whether the term "incommensurable" is appropriate here; the official term is "irrational", which means it can't be expressed exactly as a ratio: you can't write a fraction with integer numerator and denominator which is exactlyequal to the square root of 5 (or of any other integer that is not a perfect square) - but you can obviously get very close to the exact value with such a fraction. If you write the square root of 5 as a decimal, you will get an infinite amount of decimal digits, which will not repeat.
I am not sure whether the term "incommensurable" is appropriate here; the official term is "irrational", which means it can't be expressed exactly as a ratio: you can't write a fraction with integer numerator and denominator which is exactlyequal to the square root of 5 (or of any other integer that is not a perfect square) - but you can obviously get very close to the exact value with such a fraction. If you write the square root of 5 as a decimal, you will get an infinite amount of decimal digits, which will not repeat.
I am not sure whether the term "incommensurable" is appropriate here; the official term is "irrational", which means it can't be expressed exactly as a ratio: you can't write a fraction with integer numerator and denominator which is exactlyequal to the square root of 5 (or of any other integer that is not a perfect square) - but you can obviously get very close to the exact value with such a fraction. If you write the square root of 5 as a decimal, you will get an infinite amount of decimal digits, which will not repeat.
Still curious? Ask our experts.
Chat with our AI personalities
Judy
Vivi
EzraI am not sure whether the term "incommensurable" is appropriate here; the official term is "irrational", which means it can't be expressed exactly as a ratio: you can't write a fraction with integer numerator and denominator which is exactlyequal to the square root of 5 (or of any other integer that is not a perfect square) - but you can obviously get very close to the exact value with such a fraction. If you write the square root of 5 as a decimal, you will get an infinite amount of decimal digits, which will not repeat.
Add your answer:
Earn +20 pts
What is square of square root of 25?
The square root of 25 is 5.
What is the square root of 20 in simplest form?
square root of 20 = square root of 4 * square root of 5. square root of 4 = 2, so your answer is 2 square root of 5.
What is the rationalizing the radical of 3 square root of 5?
3 square root of 5 cannot be rationalised.3 square root of 5 cannot be rationalised.3 square root of 5 cannot be rationalised.3 square root of 5 cannot be rationalised.
What is the square root of 175 multiplied the square root of 5?
5 times the square root of 35 which is about 29.58039892
What is the square root of 5square root of 5 square root of 5 and so on?
It seems to be 25. Call your number "x". x = 5 square root of (5 square root of (5 ...) Square it; this will eliminate the outermost square root sign: x squared = 25 times 5 square root of (5 square root of (... Dividing the second equation by the first one, you get: x squared / x = 25 x / x x = 25
